judicial protection (supra paras. 55 to 109). It cautions that the guarantee of tenure or stability in the position and to labor stability would entail reinstatement to the position from which he had been arbitrarily removed. However, when the 2008 Constitution was enacted, the tasks of the TSE were distributed between the National Electoral Council and the Electoral Administrative Tribunal.126 The Court finds that, with the introduction of these changes in the constitutional design of the state, it has now become impossible to reinstate Mr. Aguinaga Aillón to his position as a member of the TSE, or any comparable position of similar compensation and qualifications. 119. The Court recalls from its case law,127 however, that when it is impossible to reinstate judges removed from their positions arbitrarily, they are granted compensatory damages because they are unable to resume their judicial duties. The Court therefore will order compensation, aside from any pecuniary and nonpecuniary damages it may address. It orders compensation to the victim of USD$ 60,000.00 (sixty thousand United States dollars). The amount should be paid within one year of the date of notification of this judgment. C. Measures of satisfaction 120. The representatives asked for the State to be ordered to publish the official summary of this judgment in a widely circulated national newspaper, using legible type, and for the full judgment to be posted on the official websites of the Constitutional Court, the National Assembly, the National Electoral Council and the National Court of Justice. The State argued that the measures of satisfaction requested by the representatives were inappropriate because the instant case did not show violation of international standards that would incur international State responsibility. The Commission made no specific requests on this point. 121. The Court orders, as it has in other cases,128 that the State must publish the following material within six months of the date of notification of judgment, using suitable, legible typeface: (a) the official summary of the instant judgment to be prepared by the Court, one time only, in the Official Gazette; (b) the official summary of the instant judgment to be prepared by the Court, one time only, in a widely circulated national media outlet, using suitable, legible typeface, and (c) the instant judgment in its entirety, available for one full year on the official websites of the Constitutional Court, the National Assembly, the National Electoral Council and the National Court of Justice. The State must report to this Court as soon as it has proceeded with each of the publications ordered, without awaiting the oneyear term to submit its first report as stipulated in operative paragraph nine of the instant judgment. D. Other measures requested 122. The representatives asked for the State of Ecuador to hold a public event recognizing its international responsibility in a full session of the legislature. They also asked the Court, as a guarantee of nonrepetition, to order training programs on judicial 126 Cf. Constitution of the Republic of Ecuador, October 20, 2008, Article 217 (evidence file, folio 2489). Cf. Case of Apitz Barbera et al. (“First Court of Administrative Disputes”) v. Venezuela. Preliminary Objection, Merits, Reparations and Costs. Judgment of August 5, 2008. Series C No. 182, para. 246, and Case of Nissen Pessolani v. Paraguay, supra, para. 113. 127 128 Cf. Case of Cantoral Benavides v. Peru. Reparations and Costs. Judgment of December 3, 2001. Series C No. 88, para. 79, and Case of Nissen Pessolani v. Paraguay, supra, para. 115. 36