monetary consequences that have a causal nexus with the facts.129 128. The Court points to an expert witness report submitted by the representatives to back their claim concerning payment of pecuniary damages for Mr. Aguinaga Aillón, with an accounting analysis to determine the amount of lost earnings due to compensation foregone by the victim from the time he was dismissed from his job on November 25, 2004, until his assigned term of office ended on January 14, 2007. The calculation was based on several items, including salary payments, bonuses, vacation days not taken, years of service and social benefits.130 The report set the material redress for income that Mr. Aguinaga Aillón failed to receive over this period at USD 302,998.65 (three hundred two thousand nine hundred ninety-eight United States dollars and sixty-five cents). The Court notes that the State offered no specific views on the amount of lost earnings calculated in the expert report submitted by the representatives. 129. The amount of overdue interest calculated in the expert report submitted by the representatives brings the total to USD 481,148.63 (four hundred eighty-one thousand one hundred forty-eight United States dollars and sixty-three cents). The Court would note that the amount in overdue interest was calculated by the representatives as of the time Mr. Aguinaga Aillón was removed from his position on the TSE by applying the Code of Resolution of the Monetary Board, Book One Volume V. The Court holds that the representatives have not demonstrated, in view of the provision cited above, how the overdue interest payment should be calculated for the failure to disburse salary and other payments when Mr. Aguinaga Aillón was dismissed from his position as a member of the TSE. 130. The Court therefore finds it reasonable to order the State to pay an indemnity of USD 302,998.65 (three hundred two thousand, nine hundred ninety-eight United States dollars and sixty-five cents) to Mr. Aguinaga Aillón for lost earnings for the compensation he failed to receive when he was removed from his position on November 25, 2004, until the date his term of office would have expired, January 14, 2007. The Court cautions that the case file does not show that Mr. Aguinaga Aillón held any other job in the public sector after he was dismissed from the TSE, nor that the State has claimed otherwise, and therefore the State must pay this amount fully.131 This amount should be paid within one year of the date of notification of this judgment, in the terms set forth under operative paragraph eight. E(2). Nonpecuniary damages 131. The Commission requested full redress for the human rights violations declared in the Report on the Merits, including necessary measures of indemnification and satisfaction for the pecuniary and nonpecuniary damage experienced by Mr. Aguinaga Aillón. 132. The representatives asked the Court to recognize pecuniary recompense for the damage to Mr. Aguinaga Aillón’s life plans when his professional development and his role as a public personage were interrupted as a result of his arbitrary removal from his Cf. Case of Bámaca Velásquez v. Guatemala. Reparations and Costs. Judgment of February 22, 2002. Series C No. 91, para. 43, and Case of Nissen Pessolani v. Paraguay, supra, para. 126. 129 130 Cf. Expert accounting report by Carla Renata Martínez Yerovi, August 12, 2021 (evidence file, folios 2043 to 2054). 131 Cf. Mutatis mutandi, Nissen Pessolani, para. 127. 38