11 Furthermore, it pointed out that regarding the first point of the agreement it “would awai[t] detailed information which allowed determining the impact of this activity.” 31. That the Court appreciates the efforts towards reaching an agreement made by the parties with a view to making effective the reparation measures ordered by the Court in the Judgment rendered in the instant case. The parties’ attitude reflects their commitment to prevent the occurrence in the future of events, which entail violations of human rights. Notwithstanding, though the Court appreciates the information submitted and the agreement reached, it reiterates that some of the matters referred to in said agreement have been examined and determined by the Court (supra Having Seen clause 2), and that, particularly, some of them refer to the publication of the Judgment on the merits, reparations and costs and to the training of public officials, measures which have already been declared to have been complied with. Accordingly, the Court in future will only supervise the points pending compliance (supra Having Seen clause 2 and infra Declarative paragraph 1). THEREFORE: THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS, by virtue of its authority to monitor compliance with its own decisions pursuant to Articles 33, 62(1), 62(3), 65, 67, and 68(1) of the American Convention on Human Rights, 25(1) of its Statute, and 63(4) of its Rules of Procedure, DECLARES: 1. That pursuant to the terms of Considering clause 27 of this Order, the State has partially complied with the obligation to adopt the necessary measures to strengthen the control mechanisms existing at State arrest centers (sixth operative paragraph of the Judgment). 2. That pursuant to the terms of Considering clauses 14, 19 and 27 of this Order, the following obligations are pending fulfillment: a) to comply with the measures ordered regarding the obligation to investigate the facts reported, as well as to identify, prosecute and punish the perpetrators (first operative paragraph of the Judgment); b) to provide, free of charge, psychological and psychiatric treatment at the health-care facilities the State may indicate (second operative paragraph of the Judgment), and c) to adopt the necessary measures to strengthen existing mechanism controls at State arrest centers (sixth operative paragraph of the Judgment).