5 specific cases, will entail […] breach of the judgment and infringement of Article 2 of the American Convention." In particular, he expressed disagreement with Article 22, subparagraph 3, providing for information to remain secret or confidential indefinitely in the case of certain acts and documents; Article 29, to suspend the release of information if the authority or a third party should bring a claim before the appropriate appeals court, and transitional Article 1, which would accept as legitimate the legislation on secrecy and confidentiality that existed prior to the law. 18. That the Inter-American Commission applauded "the procedures and efforts undertaken to comply with this measure of redress and looks forward to receiving information on progress and implementation of this important process in the next State report." In particular, the Commission "awaits information on whether the newly approved law is compatible and appropriate for fully complying with […] the reparations ordered by the Court." 19. That the Inter-American Court applauds the recent adoption by the National Congress of a new law on access to public information that regulates the provisions of Article 8 of the National Constitution of Chile and that, according to information provided by the representative, was to have gone into effect in the first quarter of this year. The Court asks the State to submit a copy of the full text of the law as approved and to submit its observations on comments made by the representative concerning the three specific Articles of the new law (supra Considering clause 17). * * * 20. That with regard to the obligation to provide training to public entities, authorities and agents that receive and respond to requests for access to State-held information, informing them about the laws and regulations governing this right, and that such training should incorporate the parameters established in the Convention concerning restrictions on access to this information, as established in Operative point 8 of the judgment, Chile reported that "on October 19, [2007], a seminar took place on 'Access to public information: what does the new law have to say?' This seminar was organized by the Minister/Secretary General of the President, [social organizations] and the Pro Acceso Foundation, whose president […] was the legal representative of the applicants [in the instant case]. The seminar was attended by authorities from the government and the legislative branch. The purpose was to meet with […] government officials [and others] to examine the effects and possible applications of the new law on access to information, an initiative designed to bring greater transparency to the procedures of public administration and guarantee the right of all citizens to have access to information emerging from any public entity." The State also attached a document reporting on an international seminar held on November 5-6, 2007: "Toward a new institutional structure for access to public information in Chile." The activity was organized by the Pro Acceso Foundation with support from the Minister/Secretary General of the President of Chile. The objective of the seminar was "to publicize the content and scope of this new legal instrument, thus contributing to the process of applying and implementing the new law." It was attended by a large number of people, including public officials. 21. That the Representative recognized "progress made […] in [implementing] concrete measures to promote a cultural change in favor of transparency and access to public information in the administrative structure of the State." He emphasized a number of measures: "Under the tutelage of the Minister/Secretary General of the