6 President, a unit was created for the purpose of promoting and coordinating a public policy of honesty and transparency inside the administration; government initiatives have been implemented to promote practices of good governance, and an orientation and training system has been designed and implemented for employees of the government bureaucracy, with an emphasis on honesty and transparency." He also "recognize[d] the willingness of the State to work in cooperation with civil society, especially the Pro Acceso Foundation, by sponsoring activities for seminars and exchanges." Notwithstanding this, the representative emphasized that these initiatives were "insufficient to comply fully with the judgment. The current training programs emphasize content on transparency, overlooking discussion of obligatory Conventionbased parameters regarding such subjects as restrictions on the right of access to public information[…], especially [those parameters] intended to reverse the State's practice of not responding to requests for access to public information." Finally, the representative added that the "measures adopted have not been extended to the judicial branch, which is responsible for receiving and protecting requests for access to public information." He therefore concluded that, "if the State is to comply fully with the judgment, it must deepen Convention-based content in training programs for government bureaucrats and extend this training to judges as well, particularly the judges on the Court of Appeals, which the new law defines as the only venue authorized to settle these matters[…]”. 22. That the Inter-American Commission noted "with satisfaction the information about activities undertaken to implement training programs on access to State-held information, anticipates that the State will continue to implement the measures necessary for full compliance with its obligations and hopes it will overcome the obstacles described by the representatives, so that State of Chile can report very soon on full compliance with this [obligation]." 23. That the Court applauds the training actions reported on by the State and appreciates that these actions are taking place in cooperation with civil society organizations involved in these issues, including the organization presided over by the representative of the victims in the instant case. The Inter-American Court also takes a positive view of the information supplied by the representative concerning other initiatives the State has adopted to train government bureaucrats in this area. Nonetheless, aware that international obligations are binding on all the branches and entities of the States Parties, and considering the essential role that the judicial branch of Chile is called upon to play in this area, the Court feels that in its next report, the State should provide information on training actions targeting the judicial branch. Finally, the Court also believes it is necessary for the State, in its next report, to respond to the representative's comments about the content of training activities. * * * 24. That with regard to the obligation to pay costs and expenses, established in Operative point 9 of the judgment, the State reported that on June 25, 2007, it performed this duty "by sending three bank checks by certified mail, one each to Marcel Claude Reyes, Luis Sebastián Cox Urrejola and Arturo Longton Guerrero, for a total amount in Chilean currency equivalent to US$ 10,000 (ten thousand US dollars), divided equally among the three."