returned and he mentioned that the facts were being examined in the investigations into illegal intelligence activities on the part of DAS personnel.”380 In 2013, the prosecutor decided to set the case aside.381 The Commission does not have any other information about the facts that gave rise to the investigation or regarding the decision to shelve it. iv) Other cases with the UNDH 204. The Commission notes that the UNDH opened other investigations. According to information provided by the State in its communication of January 23, 2015, the following are at the preliminary inquiry stage:382 Case UNDH 8698: Threats against CCAJAR and attempted homicide of Soraya Gutiérrez Argüello (see supra, par. 78).383 Case UNDH 8690: Threats by electronic mail against CCAJAR members. The Commission does not have any information about the specific threats that prompted the investigation or against which members of CCAJAR they were made. The Commission notes that between October 12, 2006 and August 1, 2014, there were a number of procedural activities, including the presentation of certain reports by the judicial police and the assignment of the investigation to Office 106 of the Office of the Director of the Specialized National Prosecution Unit for Human Rights and International Humanitarian Law in 2014.384 Case UNDH 8697: Threats against Soraya Gutiérrez.385 The Commission does not have any information about the specific threats against Ms. Gutiérrez that prompted the investigation. Case UNDH 8699: Threats against CCAJAR members.386 The Commission does not have any information about the specific threats that prompted the investigation or against which members of CCAJAR they were made. Case UNDH 8703: Threats against Martha Lucía Botero Vargas (at the preliminary inquiry stage).387 The Commission does not have any information about the specific threats that prompted the investigation. The Commission notes that between April 14, 2009 and August 1, 2014, there were a number of procedural activities, including interviews of the victim and two other individuals, as well as the assignment of the investigation to Office 106 of the Office of the Director of the Specialized National Prosecution Unit for Human Rights and International Humanitarian Law in 2014.388 205. The Commission does not have up-to-date information about the status of those investigations. 1.2. Cases with delegated prosecution units 206. The Commission finds that the following investigations were conducted by delegated prosecution units: Case 7141 with the Bogotá Regional Prosecution Unit. The investigation concerns threats against CCAJAR members. The Commission does not have any information about the specific threats that prompted the investigation or against which members of CCAJAR they State’s brief containing observations on merits, January 23, 2015. State’s brief containing observations on merits, January 23, 2015. 382 State’s brief containing observations on merits, January 23, 2015. 383 State’s brief containing observations on merits, January 23, 2015. 384 State’s brief containing observations on merits, January 23, 2015. 385 State’s brief containing observations on merits, January 23, 2015. 386 State’s brief containing observations on merits, January 23, 2015. 387 State’s brief containing observations on merits, January 23, 2015. 388 State’s brief containing observations on merits, January 23, 2015. 380 381 39

Seleccionar párrafo de destino3