Case 42632 with the Special Terrorism Subunit of the Bogotá Special Prosecution
Units. The investigation concerns the threatening pamphlets that contained the name of
Alirio Uribe. On April 17, 2001, the investigation was joined with that of Case UNDH 912.398
The Commission has no additional information in that regard
Case 731980 with Sectional Prosecution Unit 59. The investigation concerns an
illegal entry and threatening telephone calls to Adriana Cuéllar Ramírez (see supra, par.
102).399 On February 17, 2005, the prosecutor ordered the investigation to be suspended.
The Commission has no information about the reasons to suspend the investigation.
Case 678599 with Sectional Prosecution Unit 263. On April 2, 2003, the prosecutor
opened an investigation in relation to the attack made on February 14, 2001 on the lawyer
Soraya Gutiérrez, who is named as complainant (see supra, par. 78). On May 22 of that year
the prosecutor issued a resolution abstaining from the investigation and ordering the
proceedings to be set aside on the grounds that it was not possible to identify or single out
the perpetrator.400
Case 701328 with Sectional Prosecution Unit 245 of the Unit for Crimes against
Personal Liberty and Other Guarantees. The investigation also concerns the attack on the
lawyer Soraya Gutiérrez (see supra, par. 78) and threats received by members of the
Collective.401 The Commission does not have any information about other threats that
prompted the investigation or against which members of CCAJAR they were made. On May 3,
2004, the prosecutor ordered the investigation to be suspended.402 The Commission has no
information about the reasons to suspend the investigation.
Case 4437. The investigation concerns threats made by e-mail; it is that the
preliminary inquiry stage.403 The Commission does not have any other information about the
facts under investigation. As regards procedural activity, the Commission notes that a
selective search was done of databases, in addition to searches of premises, intercepts, and
orders issued to the judicial police to gather material elements and physical evidence.404 The
Commission has no information as to which prosecution unit is handling the case.
2.
Investigations into military intelligence operations
207. The 11th Prosecution Unit Delegated to the Supreme Court of Justice conducted the investigations into
the facts connected with the illegal intelligence operations of the DAS, specifically the acts of aggression
against CCAJAR in the context of Operation Transmilenio. The Commission finds that there are several cases
in that framework.
2.1.
Case 12495
208. On May 28, 2009, Prosecution Unit 11 opened an investigation in Case 12495 against 41 DAS personnel
for the crimes of conspiracy to commit crime, illicit violation of communications, and illicit use of
transmission/receiving equipment.405 In decisions dated June 17 and July 13, 2009, the prosecutor ordered
Office of the Attorney General, Official letter No. 120 of October 3, 2002. Annex 85 to the petitioners’ brief containing observations on
merits, December 20, 2013.
399 Petitioners’ brief containing observations on merits, December 20, 2013.
400 Office of the Attorney General, Official letter No. 0898 of October 20, 2009. Annex 96 to the petitioners’ brief containing observations
on merits, December 20, 2013.
401 Petitioners’ brief containing observations on merits, December 20, 2013.
402 Petitioners’ brief containing observations on merits, December 20, 2013.
403. State’s brief containing observations on merits, January 23, 2015.
404 State’s brief containing observations on merits, January 23, 2015.
405 Petitioners’ brief containing observations on merits, December 20, 2013. The brief makes reference to Case 12495, Prosecution Unit
11 delegated to the Supreme Court of Justice, C. 1, pp. 5 and 6.
398
41