Cruz Méndez, Isabel Domingo, Marisol Rodas, Luz Méndez, Magdalena Pedro Juan, Vilma Chub, Petrona Vásquez, Mariola Vicente, Joel Sosof, Ana Botán, Cristian Cermeño, Margarita Giron, Juan Carlos Martínez, Daniel Barczay and Evelyn Moreno, in conformity with the Order of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights from November 25, 2006. 4. To call upon the State to give participation to the beneficiaries of these measures in the planning and implementation of them, and, in general, to keep them informed about the advance regarding the execution of the measures ruled by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights. 5. To reiterate the State to keep informing the Inter-American Court of Human Rights every two months about the undertaken provisional measures, and to require the beneficiaries of these measures or their guardians to present their observations within four weeks counted after the notification of the briefs from the State, and to the InterAmerican Commission of Human Rights to present its observations regarding the mentioned briefs from the State within six weeks counted after their reception. […] 3. The briefs from the State presented on August 27, 2008 and on January 19, 2009. 4. The observations from the guardians of the beneficiaries of the provisional measures (hereinafter “the guardians”) presented on October 31, 2008 and on November 11, 2008. 5. The brief of the Inter-American Commission of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Commission” or “the Inter-American Commission”) presented on December 29, 2008 and April 22, 2009. 6. The communications from the Secretariat of the Court (hereinafter “the Secretariat”) from February 23 and March 20, 2009, through which, by following the instructions of the President of the Court, it was reiterated to the guardians to present, forthwith, their observations towards the brief from the State received on January 19, 2009. The communication from the Secretariat from April 20, 2009, through which, by following the instructions of the President of the Court, it was reiterated to the guardians about that presentation of observations, and to the Inter-American Commission the presentation of its respective observations. It is worth mentioning that up to the date of the present Resolution, the guardians have not submitted the above observations. CONSIDERING: 1. That the State ratified the American Convention on May 25, 1978, and, according to Article 62 thereof, it recognized the contentious jurisdiction of the Court on March 9, 1987. 2. That the disposition established in Article 63(2) of the Convention confers a binging nature to the passing, by the State, of the provisional measures that this Court may order, for according to the law of state responsibility, supported by the international jurisprudence, the States shall accomplish their conventional obligations under good faith (pacta sunt servanda).1 1 Cf. Matter of James et al.. Provisional Measures regarding Trinidad and Tobago. Order of the Court of June 14, 1998, Considering sixth; Matter of Pueblo Indígena Kankuamo. Provisional Measures regarding Colombia. Order of April 3, 2009, Considering fifth; and Matter Fernández Ortega et al.. Provisional Measures regarding Mexico. Order of the Court of April 30, 2009, Considering sixth.