PARTIALLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE EDUARDO VIO GROSSI CASE OF THE NATIONAL FEDERATION OF MARITIME AND PORT WORKERS (FEMAPOR) V. PERU JUDGMENT OF FEBRUARY 1, 2022, (Preliminary Objections, Merits and Reparations) I present this partially dissenting opinion to the above-mentioned judgment because I do not share the reference in Operating Paragraph No. 5 1 to Article 26 of the American Convention on Human Rights that makes justiciable, before the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, the infringement of the rights referred to in that provision. In this regard, I reiterate my position in my dissenting opinion in Casa Nina v. Peru. 2 Eduardo Vio Grossi Judge Pablo Saavedra Alessandri Registrar 1 “The State is responsible for violating Articles 26 and 21 of the American Convention, read in conjunction with Article 1(1) thereof, to the detriment of the persons listed in Annex I of this judgment, in the terms of paragraphs 107 to 115 of this judgment. 2 Case of Casa Nina v. Peru. Preliminary Objections, Merits, Reparations and Costs. Judgment of November 24, 2020.2 2 1