Luisa Fernanda Gutiérrez Reyes, Carlos Andrés Gutiérrez Rubiano and Leydi Caterin Gutiérrez Peña. B. Participation of the beneficiaries or and implementation of the measures of them informed about any advances in operative paragraph of the order of July 9, their representatives in the planning protection and, in general, keeping the provisional measures (second 2009). 24. The State referred to several coordination and monitoring meetings held with the representatives of the beneficiaries and, at times, with Wilson Gutiérrez Soler, on April 19, 2009, February 18, May 13, June 10, July 15, October 7 and November 25, 2010, attended by the State agencies responsible for implementing the measures of protection. The State advised that said meetings have permitted constant communication among the State agencies, the representatives and the beneficiary, which has meant that the observations and comments of each of the parties concerning the implementation of the measures can be assessed by the agencies and, if appropriate, the necessary corrective measures taken. 25. The representatives indicated that on April 15, 2009, a meeting was held to monitor and coordinate these measures. They mentioned that this meeting was requested by Wilson Gutiérrez, and was refused for several weeks, so that, in order to take part in it, Mr. Gutiérrez Soler had to postpone his returns to Colombia until the State agreed to hold the meeting. They highlighted that comments were presented orally during the meeting, and that those responsible for making decisions on specific protective measures were unaware of the background to the measures, the judgment handed down by the Court in the instant case and the specific circumstances of the beneficiaries. The representatives also referred to the meetings held on May 13 and June 10, 2010. 26. The Commission assessed positively the information presented by the State, and indicated that there needed to be fluid communication and constant collaboration between the parties in order to improve implementation of the provisional measures. Additionally, it indicated that the State “must make it a higher priority for [the provisional measures] to be agreed upon with the beneficiaries through adequate mechanisms of participation and coordination.” 27. The Court assesses positively the contact maintained between the State, the representatives and Wilson Gutiérrez Soler toward coordinating and implementing the provisional measures ordered by the Court. In this regard, the Court urges the parties to continue keeping pertinent channels for communication open in the most effective and expeditious way. THEREFORE: THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS, pursuant to the authority conferred by Article 63(2) of the American Convention on Human Rights and Articles 27 and 31 of its Rules of Procedure, DECIDES TO: 1. Reiterate that the Republic of Colombia maintain the provisional measures to the benefit of Wilson Gutiérrez Soler, Kevin Daniel Gutiérrez Niño and María Elena Soler de Gutiérrez in order to protect their life and personal integrity, as established in considering paragraph 18 of this Order. 8