the judgment.” The following paragraphs will outline the position of the parties regarding only those requests for reparations to which the State did not commit or on which it offered no specific comment. A. Injured Party 94. The Court reiterates that, pursuant to Article 63(1) of the Convention, it holds as an injured party anyone who has been declared victim of the violation of a right recognized in the judgment. The Court therefore holds Herminio Deras García as an “injured party,” along with the following members of his family: Otilia Flores Ortiz (wife), Lorena Deras Flores (daughter), Herminio Deras Flores (son), Eustaquia García Alvarado (mother), Domingo Deras Henríquez (father), Alba Luz Deras García (sister), Irma Isabel Deras García (sister), Consuelo Deras García (sister), Luis Rolando Deras García (brother), Héctor García (brother), Marlen García Pineda (cousin), José Herminio García (nephew), Sandra Ivón Hernández Deras (niece), Marlon Javier García Barahona (nephew), Julio Cesar Chavarría Banegas (brother-in-law), Elba Flores Ortiz (sister-in-law), and Cristóbal Rufino Hernández Pérez (brother-in-law). 95. Based on the information in the hands of the Court, several of these persons are deceased, as follows: Herminio Deras García, Eustaquia García Alvarado, Domingo Deras Henríquez, Consuelo Deras García, Héctor García, and Cristóbal Rufino Hernández B. Obligation to investigate the facts and identify, prosecute and, if applicable, sanction those responsible 96. In response to the measures of reparation requested by the Commission and the representatives, the State, in its brief of acquiescence, undertook as follows: through the Office of the Public Prosecutor, the institution in charge of criminal cases, to continue investigating the facts that led to this acquiescence, in keeping with recommendation number three of the Commission’s Report on the Merits, which reads: "Conduct a thorough and effective investigation of the human rights violations found in the instant report. That must entail: i) making every effort needed to capture Marco Tulio Regalado to ensure that he serves the sentence imposed; and ii) that all other responsibilities are investigated by the ordinary criminal justice system.” It must inform the Inter-American Court of progress made in the investigations. The State affirms for the record that Marco Tulio Regalado Hernández was arrested on November 16, 2016, for the crimes of murder, abuse of authority, breach of the duty of public officers and false arrest, for the events that gave rise to the instant case, and given a 12-year prison sentence. 97. This Court therefore orders the State to proceed, within a reasonable period and with all due diligence, to investigate, identify, prosecute and, if relevant, punish all those responsible for the extrajudicial execution of Herminio Deras García and the other human rights violations declared herein, and include all persons who were part of the chain of command. In so doing, the State must guarantee the victims full access and the capacity to act by the victims during all stages of the investigations. 83 98. The Court notes that the instant case fits into a context of “selective” and “systematic” campaigns of extrajudicial executions by military intelligence squads, particularly the 3-16 Battalion, against individuals with a certain profile, such as “mass leaders.” The Court therefore finds it would be consistent and necessary, when investigating all the individuals in Cf. Case of the Caracazo v. Venezuela. Reparations and Costs. Judgment of August 29, 2002. Series C No. 95, para. 118, and Case of Movilla Galarcio et al. v. Colombia, supra, para. 200. 83