C. Measure of restitution 102. In response to the measures of reparation requested by the Commission and therepresentatives, the State, in its brief of acquiescence, undertook as follows: immediate closure of the November 26, 1981, police record on Otilia Flores Ortiz and Elba Flores Ortiz, and closure of the June 9, 1984, police and judicial records on members of the Herminio Deras García family. The removal of these records will also be announced publicly on the official websites of the judiciary, the Secretariat of Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation, the Office of the Public Prosecutor, the Secretariat of National Defense, the Secretariat of Security, the Solicitor General, and the Secretariat of Human Rights. 103. The Court now orders the State to proceed within three months with final closure of the November 26, 1981 police record on Otilia Flores Ortiz and Elba Flores Ortiz, and the June 8, 1984 police and judicial records on family members of Herminio Deras García. 91 Similarly, the Court orders the State to proceed, over a period of six months, to remove any judicial, administrative, criminal, or police files still being held on the victims as a consequence of the records specified above, and to notify the relevant authorities accordingly. 92 It must also announce the closure of these records publicly on the official websites of the judicial branch, the Secretariat of Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation, the Office of the Public Prosecutor, the Secretariat of Security, the Solicitor General and the Secretariat of Human Rights. D. Measures of rehabilitation 104. In response to the measures of reparation requested by the Commission and the representatives, the State, in its brief of acquiescence: undertakes, through its specialized public health facilities, to provide physical and psychological health care, immediately and free of charge, to the family members of Deras García listed in clause five of this document, to be delivered with the consent and agreement of the family members and representatives; a psychological, psychiatric, physical assessment should be developed so that treatment provided is suited to the specific conditions of each victim, for as long as necessary and including cost-free supplies of any needed medications. 105. This Court accordingly orders the State to provide appropriate, effective medical, psychological and/or psychiatric treatment, immediately and free of charge, through its specialized health-care facilities, to the victims identified in the instant judgment if they so require, and to include supplies of any medications they may need. In providing the treatments, the special circumstances and needs of each victim should be considered, in 91 Following the detention on June 8, 1984, the Deras García family members and other “detained persons” were “accused of being terrorists and of attacking state security under the crime of sedition.” The relatives of the detainees and the attorney and wife of another person who was also detained lodged a remedy of habeas corpus with the trial judge in the El Progreso District Court, and it was rejected. On June 11, 1984, “the members of the Deras family and the other detainees were taken […] to the District Court of El Progreso Yoro,” but “given the lack of evidence, the detainees were released on bail and “had to pay a collective bond for the crime of sedition.” The total number of detainees was initially 24 people, but the next day, June 9, 1984, Domingo Deras Henríquez, José Herminio García and Consuelo Deras García were released. Irma Deras García, Marlen García Pineda, Sandra Ivón Hernández, Julio Cesar Chavarría Banegas, Cristóbal Rufino Hernández and Hector García were released on June 11, 1984. On November 26, 1981, Otilia Flores and Elba Flores Ortiz “were forced to sign a blank sheet of paper; they were booked and photographed in mug shots wearing badges with their numbers around their necks.” Cf. Brief with pleadings, motions and evidence (merits file, folios 109 and 166), article headlined "Liberan bajo fianza a arresta” (“Released on bond”) from the Tiempo newspaper, June 12, 1984 (evidence file, folio 1954). 92 Mutatis Mutandis. Case of Palacio Urrutia et al. v. Ecuador. Merits, Reparations and Costs. Judgment of November 24, 2021. Series C No. 446, para. 171.