12. The Court ordered the adoption of the provisional measures in favor of Mrs. Rosendo Cantú and her daughter given that their lives and personal integrity were threatened and in grave risk, as a consequence of being followed, the photographs taken, and the attempt to deprive her daughter of her liberty mentioned in the prior Order.9 In the analysis of the continuance of the risk, the Court should adhere exclusively to the facts related to the adoption of these provisional measures or new circumstances that require they be maintained. Therefore, it will not refer to or analyze any situation related to the facts regarding the provisional measures adopted in the case of Fernández Ortega et al. (infra Considering clause 13 and 30), nor to the references of the alleged risk suffered by the family members of the beneficiaries in the present provisional measures (infra Considering clause 18), who are not beneficiaries in this case. Since the adoption of the measures to the present, new facts have come about that allegedly could compromise the security of the beneficiaries (supra Considering clause 7), those of who have had to adopt, on their own, specific measures of protection, as well as accompaniment by members of the Peace Brigades,10 keeping the new address a secret, and changing their daily routine. These circumstances were confirmed in the report on the risk issued by Peace Brigades. 13. Likewise, the Court appreciates the willingness of the State to accept the risk assessment issued by Peace Brigades as a mechanism to comply with operative paragraph 2 of the Order of February 2, 2010 (supra Considering clause 5), wherein the Court requested that Mexico, among other things, present a report wherein it identifies and establishes the risk that looms over the beneficiaries of the present provisional measures. The mentioned report determined that the beneficiaries “are faced with a high, imminent, and continuous risk[.] The history of her being watched and the direct aggression towards her and her daughter, the pattern of similar aggressions towards Inés Fernández Ortega and her family members, […] and the threats to other persons directly related to the case, demonstrate the extreme gravity in the situation. [. The] situation [is] urgent, for which the full implementation of the [proposed] measures is deemed necessary. [Likewise, her] family members are also in a situation of high risk.” 14. Although facts of a grave nature of not been recently reported, the Court considers that the risk to the detriment of the beneficiaries persists in this case. The Court considers that the facts that gave rise to the provisional measures occurred in a American Court of Human Rights of July 6, 2009, Considering Clause 15; Matter of Monagas Judicial Confinement Center ("La Pica"); Matter of Yare I and Yare II Capital Region Penitenciary Center Matter of the Penitentiary Center of the Central Occidental Region (Uribana Prison), and Matter of Capital El Rodeo I & El Rodeo II Judicial Confinement Center, Provisional Measures regarding Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela. Order of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights of November 24, 2009, Considering clause 4, and Matter of A. J. et al, supra note 6, Considering Clause 11. 8 Cf. Case of Carpio Nicolle et al, supra note 7, Considering Clause 18. Matter of Ramírez Hinostroza et al. Provisional Measures regarding the Republic of Perú. Order of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights of February 3, 2010, Considering Clause 30. Matter of Caballero-Delgado and Santana. Provisional Measures regarding Colombia. Order of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights of February 3, 2010, Considering Clause 12. 9 Cf. Matter of Rosendo Cantú et al, supra note 4, Considering clauses 8 and 12. 10 Peace Brigades noted in its report that since May of 2009, it took on the direct accompaniment of the beneficiaries, due to “the harassment and attacks” suffered, wherein it includes, among others, the physical presence of the international volunteers and their daily functions, regular visits to the home, and regular meetings with national authorities. 5