13 27. The Court notes that in its Order of November 26, 2010, it asked the State to submit a complete report on the first, second, and third operative paragraphs of that Order, and also to submit the specific information requested in the twentieth and twenty-fourth considering paragraphs of the said Order, by January 31, 2011, at the latest. In this regard, the Court observes that the State submitted this report on February 21, 2011, but did not provide detailed and comprehensive information on the measures it had taken to protect the life and integrity of all the beneficiaries, or on any measures that it had adopted since it submitted its previous report to discover the whereabouts of the beneficiaries who had allegedly disappeared, as required by the Court in the sixth operative paragraph of the said Order of November 26, 2010. Consequently, in a note of the Secretariat dated March 2, 2011 (supra having seen paragraph 5), the President of the Court asked the State to present the missing information in its next bi-monthly report on the implementation of these measures. On April 5, 2011, Mexico presented this report (supra having seen paragraph 13). In it, the State, inter alia, repeated the content of its brief with observations on the request to expand the provisional measures (supra having seen paragraph 10) with regard to the alleged lack of willingness of the representatives and beneficiaries to agree on the measures of protection to be adopted in favor of the beneficiaries, and indicated that this was the reason why it had been unable “to continue with the implementation of the measures.” The Court considers that the information contained in the State’s report is insufficient and does not allow the Court to evaluate the status of implementation of the present measures with regard to all the beneficiaries. 28. Based on the above, and given the request for a hearing presented by the representatives, as well as the absence of any objection by the State, the Court ratifies the decision of the President and deems it appropriate to convene a public hearing during its ninety-first regular session to be held from June 27 to July 9, 2011, in order to receive specific updated information from the State, as well as the observations of the representatives and the Inter-American Commission on the status of implementation of these provisional measures. THEREFORE: THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS, in exercise of the authority conferred upon it by Article 63(2) of the American Convention on Human Rights and Articles 27 and 31 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court, DECIDES: 1. To ratify all aspects of the Order of the President of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights of April 1, 2011, and therefore to require the State to maintain any measures currently in place and to adopt, immediately and definitively, any complementary measures that may be necessary and effective to protect the rights to life and physical integrity of the following persons: J.O.A.R., R.G.A.R., S.A.R. and J.E.A.R., children of the beneficiary Jaime Alvarado Herrera; Sandra Luz Rueda Quezada, wife of the beneficiary Jaime Alvarado Herrera; J.G.A., daughter of the beneficiary Rosa Olivia Alvarado Herrera; D.J.A. and J.A., daughters of the beneficiary Manuel Melquíades Alvarado Herrera, and Mayra Daniela Salais Rodríguez, wife of the beneficiary Manuel Melquíades Alvarado Herrera. 2. To reiterate to the State that it must adopt immediately all necessary measures to ascertain promptly the whereabouts of Rocío Irene Alvarado Reyes, Nitza Paola