Ultimate Fate of 33 Citizens since they are contradictory and also contradict the information provided by the Government on the fate of Mr. Tassino at the moment of his disappearance.122 On March 21, 2007, that court dismissed the request for an investigation.123 On July 21, 2007, the same court received a request to reopen the case and to take testimony of all the actions undertaken.124 98. The representative pointed out that the case was “reopened” (desarchivado) without giving a date. The Office of the Prosecutor indicated that the investigation was continued after June 30, 2011, when the Executive Branch revoked its orders issued under Article 3 of the Expiry Law (supra paras. 40 and 44).125 99. The representative indicated that “the principal suspect,” E.F., fled before giving testimony in the case. It pointed out that there was an international order for his arrest and that, on September 7, 2017, he was detained in Spain. However, he was granted an alternative measure of deprivation of liberty, and he fled before a decision was taken on his extradition. 100. The representative also informed that “in 2017 it submitted, on behalf of the complainants, information on a spot near the last known place of Mr. Tassino [Asteazu] (‘La Tablada’), where his remains might be buried.” It affirmed that, despite various requests for information, no effective action had been taken to exhume the remains. The Special Prosecutor, however, pointed out that, by judicial order of November 17, 2020, “work was begun on the excavation” in La Tablada.126 101. By communication of October 22, 2020, the Office of the Prosecutor requested of the judicial authority the “imprisonment pending trial” of J.S., a military official who was Captain of the Coordinating Body of Anti-Subversive Operations at the time of the events, as well as a request that INTERPOL inform on the measures taken to locate E.F. At the same time, a medical group was asked to determine whether another of the “involved” could testify.127 102. According to information provided by the State, a decree was issued on April 29, 2021 for the “imprisonment pending trial” of E.F.128 Later, a “request for recusal” against the judge hearing the case and “appeals of revocation and of prosecution” were presented. The former was denied. With respect to the appeals, the “appeal to a higher court” was complied with on June 28, 2021.129 On June 23, 2021, the “imprisonment Cr. Request of November 20, 2006 of the next of kin of Mr. Tassino to the Tenth Criminal Court (evidence file, annex 3(14) to the Merits Report, fs. 1089 to 1106). 122 Cf. Decree 213 of March 21, 2007 of the Tenth Criminal Court (evidence file, annex 3(15) to the Merits Report, fs. 1107 to 1113). 123 Request of the next of kin of Mr. Tassino to reopen and to examine the files, of July 21, 2007 (evidence file, annex 3(16) to the Merits Report, fs. 1114 to 1116). 124 Cf. Office of the Prosecutor General, request to prosecute of October 22, 2020 (evidence file, annex XXVII to the answering brief, fs. 3824 to 3835). 125 126 Cf. Undated Report of the Special Prosecutor. 127 Cf. Prosecutor General of the Nation, request to prosecute of October 22, 2020. Cf. Proceedings 461/2021 of April 29, 2021 (evidence file, f. 7486), substantiated the next day (cf. Judgment 463/2021 of April 30, 2021 (evidence file, fs. 7691 to 7739)). 128 129 Judicial report of July 2, 2021, sent to the Supreme Court (evidence file, fs. 7479 to 7481). 29