9 in order to enable the Court to fully meet its obligation to report on compliance with its judgments, it is necessary that States Parties duly provide the information required from them.9 35. In this regard, Peru should take all necessary steps to effectively comply with the provisions of the Court set forth in the Judgment. This includes the State's duty to inform the Court about the measures taken to comply with the Court's provisions in the said Judgment. The President-in-Office wishes to highlight and remind that the timely observance of the State's obligation to inform the Court of how it is complying with each of the points ordered by the Court is essential to assess the status of compliance with the Judgment as a whole, and this is not the mere formal presentation of a document to the Court, but rather it is a dual obligation that, in order to be effectively complied with, requires the formal presentation of a document on time and that presents specific, true, current, detailed reference material on the issues on which the obligation rests.10 36. In monitoring compliance with the Judgment, the Presidency considers that further information is required on State actions to comply with outstanding operative paragraphs. 37. In the present case it is appropriate to convene a closed hearing so that the Court receive, in accordance with the provisions of Article 69 of it Rules of Procedure,11 complete and updated information on compliance with the reparation measures ordered in the Judgment that are pending compliance and to listen to the respective observations of the Inter-American Commission and the representatives. THEREFORE: THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS, in exercising its authority to monitor compliance with its decisions in accordance with Articles 33, 67, and 68(1) of the American Convention on Human Rights, Articles 24(1), 25(1) and 25(2) of the Statue, and Articles 4, 15(1), 31 and 69 of its Rules of Procedure, RESOLVES: 1. To summon the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, the representatives of victims, and the State of Peru to a private hearing to be held at the headquarters of the Inter-American Court on Saturday February 26, 2011, from 9 Cf. General Assembly Resolution AG/RES. 2587 (XL-O/10) adopted at the fourth plenary session, held on June 8, 2010, entitled "Observaciones y Recomendaciones al Informe Anual de la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos" [Observations and Recommendations on the Annual Report of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights], operative paragraph four. 10 Cf. Case of Bámaca Velásquez v. Guatemala. Monitoring compliance with Judgment. Order of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights of July 4, 2006, Considering Clause seven; Case of Suárez Rosero v. Ecuador. Monitoring compliance with Judgment. Order of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights of July 10, 2007, Considering Clause five and Case of Loayza Tamayo v. Peru. Monitoring compliance with Judgment. Order of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights of September 22, 2006, Considering Clause seven. 11 Rules of Procedure of the Court, passed at its LXXXV Ordinary Session, held from 16 to 28 November, 2009.