2 4. [The] Judgment itself is a form of reparation, pursuant to paragraph 97 of the […] Judgment. AND ORDER[ED]: [u]nanimously that: 1. The State must: a) effectively investigate the facts of the […] case in order to identify, prosecute, and punish the intellectual and material authors of the extrajudicial execution of Mr. Pedro Hulica Tecse. The result of the process must be released to the public, pursuant to paragraphs 10 and 108 of the […] Judgment; b) carry out an act of public recognition of responsibility in the […] case, and publicly issue an apology to the next of kin of the victim, pursuant to paragraph 111 of the […] Judgment; d) establish a subject or course on human rights and labor rights, to be known as the “Cátedra Pedro Huilca”, pursuant to paragraph 113 of the […] Judgment; e) on official holiday May 1 (labor day), recall and praise the work of Mr. Pedro Huilca Tecse and the union movement of Peru, pursuant to paragraph 114 of the […] Judgment f) erect a bust in memory of Mr. Pedro Huilca Tecse, pursuant to paragraph 115 of the […] Judgment; g) offer psychological treatment and attention to the next of kin of the victim, pursuant to paragraph 116 of the […] Judgment; h) pay the amounts set by paragraphs 98 and 99 of the […] Judgment to the next of kin of the victim in this case, for non-pecuniary damages, pursuant to paragraphs 92, 100, 101, 120, and 121 of the […] Judgment; i) pay the amount set in paragraph 94 of the […] Judgment for pecuniary damage to Mrs. Martha Flores Gutiérrez, pursuant to paragraphs 95 and 120 of the […] Judgment; and j) deposit the damages allocated to minors Indrira Isabel Huilca Flores and José Carlos Huilca Flores in a bank investment under their names, in a solvent Peruvian institution, in dollars of the United States of America or in local currency, at the discretion of the person who legally represents them, within a time period agreed upon by both parties, and under the most favorable conditions permitted under the law and banking practices, while they are minors, pursuant to the paragraphs 120.3 and 121 of the […] Judgment. 2. Insofar as the agreement [had] been approved by the […] Judgment, any conflict or disagreement that arises will be resolved by the Tribunal, in accordance with paragraph 122 of the […] Judgment. 3. The State must submit to the Inter-American Court of Human Rights a report on compliance with the Judgment within the time period of one year, beginning from the notification of the Judgment, in accordance with paragraph 123 of the […] Judgment. 4. [The Court w]ill monitor the State’s compliance with the obligations established in the […] Judgment and consider the case closed once the State has fully complied with it. 2. The Order issued by the Inter-American Court on September 22, 2006, through which it: DECLARE[D]: 1. That, in accordance with Considering clause No. 10 of [the] Order, the State has complied with its obligation to: