mother, brothers, and sister) of Luis Eduardo Casierra Quiñonez have been subject to profound suffering and anguish, harming their mental and moral integrity, as a consequence of the death of their loved one, to which is added the lack of clarification of what happened, extending over more than two decades. 166. It should be noted that the State's allegations, which were centered on the actions of the military to transfer the wounded to a hospital on the day of the events and on the alleged efforts to "repair the damage," do not rule out or undermine, in any way, the effects caused to the next of kin of Luis Eduardo Casierra Quiñonez as a result of his death in the context of the excessive use of lethal force by agents of security forces and the lack of an adequate response by the justice system since the day of the events and up to the present day. 167. Consequently, the Court finds that the State violated the right to humane treatment recognized in Article 5(1) of the American Convention, in relation to Article 1(1) of the same instrument, to the detriment of the following next of kin of Luis Eduardo Casierra Quiñones: a) María Ingracia Quiñonez Bone, mother; b) Cipriano Casierra Panezo, father; c) Sebastián Darlin, Andrés Alejandro and Jonny Jacinto, surnamed Casierra Quiñones, brothers, and d) Shirley Lourdes Quiñonez Bone, sister. IX REPARATIONS 168. Based on Article 63(1) of the American Convention, the Court has indicated that any violation of an international obligation that has caused damage entails the duty to adequately remedy it, and that this provision includes a customary norm that constitutes one of the principles of contemporary International Law in relation to a State's responsibility.143 169. In this regard, repairing the damage caused by the breach of an international obligation requires, whenever possible, full restitution (restitutio in integrum), which consists of reestablishing the previously existing situation. If this is not feasible, the Court will determine measures to guarantee the violated rights and repair the consequences that the offenses produced.144 To this effect, the Court finds it necessary to grant various measures of reparation, in order to comprehensively compensate the damage. As a result, in addition to pecuniary compensation, the measures of restitution, rehabilitation, satisfaction, and guarantees of nonrepetition are especially relevant for the damage caused.145 Likewise, this Court has established that the reparations must have a causal link with the facts of the case, the declared violations, the proven damages, as well as the measures requested to repair the respective damages.146 170. Consequently, based on the violations declared in this Judgment, the Court will proceed to analyze the claims presented by the Commission and the representatives, as well as the State's arguments. A. Injured party 171. Pursuant to Article 63(1) of the American Convention, this Court considers the injured party to be anyone who has been declared a victim of the violation of any right in this Cf. Case of Velásquez-Rodríguez v. Honduras Reparations and Costs. Judgment of July 21, 1989. Series C No. 7, para. 25, and Case of Digna Ochoa and Family Members v. Mexico, supra, para. 150. 144 Cf. Case of Velásquez-Rodríguez v. Honduras Reparations and Costs, 1999 . supra, para. 65, and Case of Digna Ochoa and Family Members v. Mexico, supra, para. 151. 145 Cf. Case of the “Las Dos Erres” Massacre v. Guatemala. Preliminary Objection, Merits, Reparations and Costs. Judgment of November 24, 2009. Series C No. 211, para. 226, and Case of Digna Ochoa and Family Members v. Mexico, supra, para. 151. 146 Cf. Case of Ticona Estrada et al. v. Bolivia. Merits, Reparations and Costs. Judgment of November 27, 2008. Series C No. 191, and the Case of Digna Ochoa and Family Members v. Mexico, supra, para. 152. 143 39