corresponding provisions of the Declaration.127 In this regard, Article XIV of the aforementioned Declaration provides that "every person has the right to work, under proper conditions, and to follow his vocation freely [...].” Likewise, Article 29(d) of the American Convention expressly provides that "[n]o provision of this Convention may be interpreted as: [...] (d) excluding or limiting the effect that the American Declaration of the Rights and Duties of Man and other international acts of the same nature may have." Furthermore, the Court indicated that the corpus iuris international128 establishes the referred right.129 102. Additionally, the Court has clarified that job security does not mean remaining in the position with no limitations, but rather, refers to respect of this right, among other measures, by granting due guarantees of protection to the worker so that if he or she is dismissed, it be with justification, which means that the employer must provide sufficient reasons to impose this sanction with the due guarantees, and that the worker may appeal this decision before the domestic authorities, who must verify that the justification given is not arbitrary or unlawful.130 Likewise, the Court has indicated in the Case of San Miguel Sosa et al. v. Venezuela that the State fails to fulfill its obligation to guarantee the right to work and, consequently, job security, when it does not protect its state officials from arbitrary terminations of their employment relationships.131 103. As has been referred to in this Judgment, when performing the duties of administrators of justice, prosecutors must enjoy job security guarantees as an basic condition of their independence to property fulfill their duties (above para. 58). In the instant case, the Court concluded that the JEM's decision to remove then Prosecutor Nissen Pessolani was arbitrary, as it did not comply with the guarantees of due process, which also constituted a violation of the right to job security, as part of the right to work, which as an employee of the Public Prosecutor's Office of Paraguay, he was entitled to during the time he held the position. 104. In accordance with the foregoing, the State is responsible for the violation of the right to job security, as recognized in Article 26 of the Convention. VII REPARATIONS 105. Based on the Article 63(1) of the American Convention, the Court has indicated that every violation of an international obligation which results in harm creates a duty to make adequate reparation, and that this provision includes a customary norm that Cf. Interpretation of the American Declaration of the Rights and Duties of Man in the Framework of Article 64 of the American Convention on Human Rights. Advisory opinion OC-10/89 of July 14, 1989. Series A No. 10, para. 43, and Case of Pavez Pavez v. Chile, supra, para. 87. 127 For example: Article 6 of the International Covenant on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights, Article 23 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Articles 7 and 8 of the Social Charter of the Americas, Articles 6 and 7 of the Additional Protocol to the American Convention on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights, Article 11 of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women, Article 32.1 of the Convention on the Rights of the Child, as well as Article 1 of the European Social Charter and Article 15 of the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights. 128 129 87. 130 134. Cf. Case of Lagos del Campo v. Peru, supra, para. 145, and Case of Pavez Pavez v. Chile, supra, para. Cf. Case of Lagos del Campo v. Peru, supra, para. 150, and Case of Mina Cuero v. Ecuador, supra, para. Cf. Case of San Miguel Sosa et al. v. Venezuela, supra, para. 221. See also, Case of Mina Cuero v. Ecuador, supra, para. 134. 131 32