34. The representative confirmed that “it [was] true” that the State had fulfilled its obligation to publish the pertinent parts of the Judgment in the Official Gazette and in a newspaper of wide national circulation. 35. The Inter-American Commission took note of that reported by the State and the representative, and it indicated that this reparation measure should be deemed to have been fulfilled. 36. The Court found that the State has indeed published, in the Official Gazette and in a newspaper of national circulation, once, the pertinent parts of the Judgment ordered by the Court in Operative Paragraph 7 thereof. Moreover, it notes the satisfaction expressed by the representatives and the Commission in this regard. Therefore, the Court finds that the State has fully complied with Operative Paragraph 7 of the Judgment. D. Request of the victims' representative for a hearing 37. In the briefs of February 10 and June 3, 2011, the representative requested that the Court summon the parties to a hearing on monitoring of compliance with the Judgment in order for the Court to “instruct the State" on the need to provide the appropriate resources to achieve compliance, given that the State does not seem “to have any intention of doing so.” 38. In this regard, the Court finds that, for the moment, it is not necessary to hold a hearing to monitor compliance with the Judgment, given that through this Order, the Court is evaluating the operative paragraphs of the Judgment that have been totally or partially complied with, as well as the operative paragraph pending compliance, with regard to which it has urged compliance and requested the necessary information from Peru. THEREFORE: THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS, in exercising its authority to monitor compliance with its decisions in accordance with Articles 33, 61(1), 62(3), 65, 67, and 68(1) of the American Convention on Human Rights, Article 25(1) and 30 of the Statue, and Article 31(2) and 69 of its Rules of Procedure, DECLARES: 1. In accordance with Considering Clauses 13 and 36 of the present Order, the State has fully complied with the following operative paragraphs of the Judgment: a) and To reimburse costs and expenses (Operative Paragraph 5 of the Judgment), b) To publish the relevant parts of the Judgment once in the Official Gazette and once in another newspaper that is widely circulated nationally (Operative Paragraph 7 of the Judgment).