3.
To adapt its domestic legislation, in particular, the provisions of the Constitution and the
Single Disciplinary Code, which allow respectively the power to dismiss and disqualify elected officials from
the Inspector General's Office in the exercise of their disciplinary authority.
4.
To adapt its criminal regulations to ensure that references to disciplinary or fiscal procedures
are not included in the criminal offences related to the election of disqualified persons. In any case, the State
must abstain from applying the criminal offense foreseen in article 5 of Law 1834 of 2017, taking into account
the determinations on the unconventionality of the disciplinary or fiscal dismissal, without a final criminal
conviction.
5.
To adopt legislative or other measures necessary to ensure the impartiality of the disciplinary
authority, in such a way that the authority that files the charges is not the same one called to decide
disciplinary responsibility.
6.
To adopt legislative or other measures necessary to guarantee the effective possibility to
appeal disciplinary decisions before a different authority than the one that determined the disciplinary
responsibility, ensuring an integral revision of the sanctioning decisions.
7.
To adopt the necessary measures to ensure that the judicial requests of nullification and
reversal are resolved within a reasonable time, including those within the direct jurisdiction of the State
Council.
29