286. Based on the above, the Court considers it proven that the State violated Article 5(1) of the American Convention, in relation to Article 1(1) thereof, to the detriment of Florinda Rosa Cajal. B.1.5. Next of kin of Ricardo David Videla Fernández 287. Regarding the harm to the personal integrity of Ricardo Roberto Videla and Stella Maris Fernandez, parents of Ricardo David Videla Fernandez, the Court observes that, during the public hearing held in this case, Ms. Fernandez stated that she did not expect her son to receive a life sentence, and recalled that when the sentence was handed down, she “just gave him a kiss, and stayed there crying.” Also, according to the social report on the family of Ricardo David Videla prepared on November 30, 2011, following the death of her son: “Stella Maris said she had no words to describe how painful it was to lose [her son] in the circumstances in which he died […]. Her doctor suggested she start psychological treatment because he considered that her hypertension was directly related to her emotional distress. In this regard, he stressed that she knows that she is not well emotionally and that she cannot help thinking all the time that 'just as there was a possibility of a review of David’s sentence and he was hoping to enjoy life with his family and especially his son someday, what happened, happened.” 369 288. Regarding Ricardo Roberto Videla, the Court observes that the social report only records his visits to the detention center where his son was imprisoned. 370 However, the severe emotional pain experienced by the parents of an inmate who dies in a State detention center is evident to the Court, both as a direct result of the death, and owing to the lack of an effective investigation into the matter. Consequently, the Court finds that the State violated the right to personal integrity recognized in Article 5(1) of the American Convention, in relation to Article 1(1) thereof, to the detriment of Stella Maris Fernandez and Ricardo Roberto Videla. B.1.6. Conclusions 289. Based on the foregoing, the Court finds that the next of kin of César Alberto Mendoza, Claudia David Núñez, Lucas Matías Mendoza, Saúl Cristian Roldán Cajal and Ricardo David Videla Fernández identified in paragraphs 274, 280, 283, 286 and 288 of this chapter suffered pain and anguish due to the life sentences imposed on them, for the perpetration of offenses while they were minors, which led to family disintegration and, at times, adverse physical effects. All this had an impact on the personal integrity of the said next of kin, in violation of Article 5(1) of the American Convention, in relation to Article 1(1) thereof, to their detriment. XII DOMESTIC LEGAL EFFECTS 290. Both the Commission and the representative argued the State’s failure to comply with the obligation contained in Article 2 of the American Convention, 371 in relation to the 369 Cf. Social report on Ricardo David Videla Fernández of November 30, 2011 (file of annexes to the pleadings and motions brief, tome XIII, folio 7129). 370 Cf. Social report on Ricardo David Videla Fernández of November 30, 2011 (file of annexes to the pleadings and motions brief, tome XIII, folio 7127). 371 Article 2 establishes that: “[w]here the exercise of any of the rights or freedoms referred to in Article 1 is not already ensured by legislative or other provisions, the States Parties undertake to adopt, in accordance with 93