necessary. 382 When providing the treatment, the specific circumstances and needs of each victim must also be considered, as agreed with each of them and following an individual assessment. The victims who request this measure of reparation, or their legal representatives, have six months from notification of this Judgment, to advise the State of their intention to receive the medical and psychological or psychiatric care ordered. 383 B.1.2. Education and/or training B.1.2.1. Arguments of the Commission and pleadings of the parties 313. The representative indicated that the violations against César Alberto Mendoza, Claudio David Núñez, Lucas Matías Mendoza, and Saúl Cristian Roldán Cajal “not only prevented the realization of their expectations from a professional or employment standpoint, but also terminated any possibility of self-realization.” According to the representative, currently the youths have no future project, with no educational training or job or housing prospects. Hence, she stated that the impairment of their self-realization could only be compensated by the payment of a sum of money or the delivery of goods or services with a monetary value that allow them to resume their studies, their employment or professional training, and to reconstitute their family ties. The Commission and the State did not present arguments or observations, respectively. B.1.2.2. Considerations of the Court 314. The Court finds, as it has in other cases, that the life project relates to the integral self-realization of the person concerned, taking into consideration their vocation, skills, circumstances, potential and aspirations that allow them to establish certain reasonable expectations and to achieve them. 384 It is also expressed in the expectations for personal, professional and family development that are possible under normal conditions. 385 The Court has indicated that “harm to the life project” involves the loss or severe impairment of opportunities for personal development, in a way that is irreparable or very difficult to repair. 386 This harm is derived from the constraints suffered by a person to relate to and to enjoy their personal, family or social environment due to serious injuries caused to them of a physical, mental, psychological or emotional nature. The integral reparation of the damage to the “life project” generally calls for measures of reparation that go beyond mere pecuniary compensation, consisting of measures of rehabilitation, satisfaction and a guarantee of non-repetition. 387 In some recent cases, the Court has assessed this type of damage and provided reparation for it. 388 Furthermore, the Court observes that some 382 Cf. Case of the Las Dos Erres Massacre v. Guatemala. Preliminary objection, merits, reparations and costs. Judgment of November 24, 2009. Series C No. 211, para. 270, and Case of the Massacre of Santo Domingo v. Colombia, para. 309. 383 Cf. Case of the 19 Tradesmen v. Colombia. Merits, reparations and costs. Judgment of July 5, 2004. Series C No. 109, para. 278, and Case of the Massacre of Santo Domingo v. Colombia, para. 309. 384 Cf. Case of Loayza Tamayo v. Peru. Reparations and costs. Judgment of November 27, 1998. Series C No. 42, para. 147, and Case of Furlan and family members v. Argentina, para. 285. 385 Cf. Case of Loayza Tamayo v. Peru. Reparations and costs, para. 148, and Case of Furlan and family members v. Argentina, para. 285. 386 Cf. Case of Loayza Tamayo v. Peru. Reparations and costs, para. 150, and Case of Furlan and family members v. Argentina, para. 285. 387 Cf. Case of Cantoral Benavides v. Peru. Reparations and costs, para. 80, and Case of Furlan and family members v. Argentina, para. 285. 388 Cf. Case of the Las Dos Erres Massacre v. Guatemala, paras. 284 and 293, and Case of Furlan and family members v. Argentina, paras. 285 and 286. 99