established in Article 21 of the American Convention, in relation to Article 1(1), to the detriment of some presumed victims. 483 440. The representatives referred to the fact that some of the presumed victims were forced from their home without having the opportunity to take their possessions with them, and without being able to return to their place of origin for a long time. In other cases, they indicated that the presumed victims were deprived of the possessions that they had taken with them by the authorities who detained them. The representatives considered that “the expulsion of the presumed victims entailed, for all of them, interference in the enjoyment of the right to property in relation to several of their belongings.” Consequently, they asked the Court to declare that the State had violated Article 21 of the Convention, in relation to Article 1(1) of this instrument, to the detriment of Willian Medina Ferreras, Jeanty Fils-Aimé, Victor Jean, Bersson Gelin and Rafaelito Pérez Charles. 441. For its part, the State asserted that there was no evidence in the case file to prove material losses, “not even documentary or circumstantial proof, other than the statements of the presumed victims themselves that, at some time, they had possessed these objects, money or household goods.” Accordingly, the State indicated that it was not responsible for the presumed violations of the right contained in Article 21 of the Convention, in relation to Article 1(1) of this instrument, to the detriment of some presumed victims. 484 B) Considerations of the Court 442. The Court has already determined that the expulsion of Ana Virginia Nolasco and her daughters, Ana Lidia and Reyita Antonia, both surnamed Sensión, falls outside the temporal competence of the Court; hence, it is not pertinent to examine the alleged violation of the right to property recognized in Article 21 of the Convention, in relation to them. 443. As regards the members of the Medina, Jean, Fils-Aimé, Bersson Gelin and Rafaelito Pérez Charles families, although both the Commission and the representatives argued the loss of household furnishings, personal effects, clothing, livestock (pigs, hens, cows, horses), savings and cash or wages owed to the presumed victims, the Court considers that the facts described and alleged by the Commission and the representatives are related to facts that have already been examined in Chapter IX of this Judgment, so that there is no need to rule on this. XIII REPARATIONS (Application of Article 63(1) of the American Convention) 444. Based on Article 63(1) of the American Convention, the Court has indicated that any violation of an international obligation that has caused harm entails the duty to make adequate reparation, and that this provision reflects a customary norm that constitutes 483 Including: Willian Medina Ferreras, Lilia Jean Pierre, Awilda Medina, Luis Ney Medina, Carolina Isabel Medina, Jeanty Fils-Aimé, Janise Midi, Nené Fils-Aimé, Diana Fils-Aimé, Antonio Fils-Aimé, Endry Fils-Aimé, Bersson Gelin, Ana Virginia Nolasco, Ana Lidia Sensión, Reyita Antonia Sensión, Rafaelito Pérez Charles, Victor Jean, Marlene Mesidor, Markenson Jean, Victoria Jean, Miguel Jean and Natalie Jean. 484 Including: Willian Medina Ferreras, Lilia Jean Pierre, Awilda Medina, Luis Ney Medina, Carolina Isabel Medina (deceased), Jeanty Fils-Aimé, Janise Midi, Nené Fils-Aimé, Diane Fils-Aimé, Antonio Fils-Aimé, Endry FilsAimé, Bersson Gelin, Rafaelito Pérez Charles, Victor Jean, Marlene Mesidor, Markenson Jean, Victoria Jean, Miguel Jean and Natalie Jean. 140