the Merits report as Jeanty Fils-Aimé is not registered, and referred to statements by individuals who have said that the real name of the person indicated is “Yantil” or “Fanty” and that he is Haitian. 50 65. Gelin family. The State alleged that the representatives had waived the possibility of presenting arguments in favor of Julie Sainlice, 51 Jamson Gelin, Faica Gelin and Kenson Gelin, because their situation related to the life of Bersson Gelin and his family in Haiti, and had no causal nexus with the supposed facts of the case; in addition, the State had obligations with regard to individuals in its territory, and could not “assess facts or acts […] that occurred outside [this].” It also asserted that the power of attorney granted by Bersson Gelin “does not include [Willian Gelin] as a beneficiary of the legal defense and request for reparations” and that, even though Julie Sainlice granted a power of attorney on May 9, 2012, neither the Commission nor the representatives named this person as a presumed victim. Also, in relation to the person who was identified as Bersson Gelin in the Merits report, a document exists in which the State affirmed that his supposed Dominican identity card was not registered. 52 66. Sensión Family. Regarding Antonio Sensión, Reyita Antonia Sensión Nolasco (hereinafter also “Reyita Antonia Sensión” or “Reyita Antonia”), Ana Lidia Sensión Nolasco (hereinafter also “Ana Lidia Sensión” or “Ana Lidia”) and Ana Virginia Nolasco, the State asserted that the signature of Antonio Sensión on the power of attorney that he granted does not coincide with the signatures on the three sworn statements provided by the Commission and, also, that the power of attorney does not bear the signature or seal of the notary public. It also questioned Ana Virginia Nolasco, alleging that Antonio Sensión refers to his wife as “Ana Virgil” in his statements of May 8, 2001, and March 27, 2007, but the Commission, in the brief submitting the case and in the Merits report, and the representatives in their motions and arguments brief, refer to Ana Virginia Nolasco. Furthermore, the State indicated that the representatives had waived the possibility of presenting arguments in favor of Ana Dileidy, Maximiliano, Emiliano and Analideire, all surnamed Sensión; moreover, as Maximiliano was deceased, and “since he has been established as an indirect victim,” his “eventual right to reparations has ceased.” 67. Pérez Charles family. The State affirmed that, according to the official records, María Esthel Matos Medina, who the Merits report refers to as “María Esther Medina Matos,” is not the mother of Rafaelito Pérez Charles. However, the representatives indicated that Clesineta Charles 53 agreed to register Rafaelito as her son due to problems experienced by Mrs. Matos Medina who, according to the representatives, is his real mother. However, this statement alone does not disprove the legal presumption juris et de jure provided by Rafaelito’s birth certificate. Regarding Jairo and Gimena, both surnamed Pérez Medina, the State indicated that doubts exist about their relationship to Mr. Pérez Charles, because this has not been proved. The State indicated, on the one hand, that it has not been alleged or proved that they are the children of Rafael Pérez, father of Rafaelito Pérez Charles and, on the other hand, that, since Mrs. Matos Medina is not the mother of the latter, the maternal surname is different. 50 The State’s thirtieth report on compliance with the provisional measures mentions that Jeanty Fils-Aimé is “Yantil” or “Fanty.” 51 During the public hearing, the State added that its arguments were not altered by the representatives’ explanation about the name of the person identified in the Merits report as “Gili Sainlis” who, according to this explanation, is Julie Sainlice (supra footnote 11). 52 The State’s thirtieth report on compliance with the provisional measures. 53 Although the representatives referred to “Clerineta Charles” in the motions and arguments brief, for the effects of this Judgment, the Court will refer to her as “Clesineta Charles,” because this is the name that appears on the birth certificate of Rafaelito Pérez Charles (infra para. 95). 24