3 2. Require that the State determine and pay, pursuant to the domestic law applicable most favorable for the victims and observing the guarantees of the due process, the interests generated during the time in which it incurred in delays with regard to the payment of the arrears of salary and other benefits of Messrs. Manuel Aguirre Roca, Guillermo Rey Terry, and Delia Revoredo Marsano. 3. Request that the State present, no later than January 31, 2005, a detailed report in which it indicates the actual state of the investigations to determine the people responsible for the violations of human rights committed against the victims of the case and their punishment – as well as the measures carried out for the payment of the arrears of salary, other benefits, and the corresponding interests that, pursuant to domestic legislation, correspond to Messrs. Manuel Aguirre Roca, Guillermo Rey Terry y Delia Revoredo Marsano – as stated in the eighth and ninth whereas clauses of the present Ruling. 4. The brief of January 10, 2005, through which Mrs. Herlinda Ibáñez viuda de Aguirre declared that the State (hereinafter the “State” or “Peru”) had not complied with the compensation of the arrears of salary set at S/ 839,496.22 new soles. 5. The brief of January 14, 2005, through which Mrs. Delia Revoredo Marsano de Mur informed that the State had partially complied with the compensatory payment regarding the arrears of salary and had delivered three checks for the amount of S/ 300,000.00, S/ 20,000.00, and S/ 2,000.00 new soles which totaled S/ 322,000.00 new soles equal to US $100,000.00 (one hundred thousand dollars of the United States of America), leaving an outstanding balance of S/ 517,496.22 new soles. 6. The brief of February 21, 205, through which Mrs. Pilar Vega Alvear viuda de Rey informed that the State had partially complied with the compensatory payment regarding the arrears of salary through a check for the amount of S/ 322,000.00 new soles equal to US $100,000.00 (one hundred thousand dollars of the United States of America). However, the State had not referred to the opportunity on which it would comply with the outstanding amount, or with regard to the interests for delayed payments earned. 7. that The report of February 25, 2005, through which the State declared, inter alia, a) regarding the investigation of the facts, information had been requested to the Congress of the Republic, without having received any response. On the other hand, the Ombudsman had stated that the Political Constitution acknowledged the Congress’ power to apply sanctions for essentially political constitutional infractions, which could be applied in the present case. On February 21, 2005 the State requested that the Ombudsman precise how said measure would be implemented, since the Congress of the Republic had decided to file the claim, and b) regarding the payment of the arrears of salaries and other benefits, the State had paid Mrs. Delia Revoredo Marsano and Sara del Pilar Alvear viuda de Rey the amount of S/ 322,000.00 new soles each for the concept of the arrears of salary, being in process the payment of the successors of Mr. Manuel Aguirre Roca, as well as the outstanding balance of the other two people for the amount of S/ 517,496.22 new soles corresponding to the arrears of salary. Besides, on November 11, 2004 the Ministry of Justice requested the Ministry of Economics and Finances that it adopt the measures necessary to comply with the