9 31, 2006 […]” and provided said document as an attachment to the report. It further stated that the delay in payment of the first installment was not a result of the State’s unwillingness to pay but, rather, was due to the fact that she had failed to timely submit the power of attorney to represent her children (supra Having Seen clause No. 3). 29. That, as regards to the failure to provide a copy of the release document for payment of the first installment to María Martínez-García or Maruca Martínez, in her capacity as agent for her children Zoila, Pedro, and Adolfo or Rodolfo Soto-Martínez, in the observations submitted on April 7, 2008 the representatives noted that, as per the documents provided by the State, Mrs. María Martínez-García received payment of the second and third installments on behalf of the aforementioned children, and they argued that it was necessary for the State to explain its failure to make payment of the first installment to each of the aforementioned persons (supra Having Seen clause No. 4). 30. That, based on the information submitted by the State, the Court has verified that the State effected payment of the first installment that was owing to Zoila, Pedro and Adolfo or Rodolfo Soto-Martínez through their agent, Mrs. María Martínez-García or Maruca Martínez. * * * 31. That, as regards to the failure to submit the release document for payment of the first installment to Gregoria Tecú-Chajáj –who, as verified by the Court in its Order of November 28, 2007, had received payment of the second, but not the first, installment– , the State indicated that she had already been paid the first installment and provided release document No. 45 evidencing such payment. 32. That, based on the information submitted by the State, the Court verified that the first installment which was owing to Gregoria Tecú-Chajáj was actually paid to her. * * * 33. That the Court notes that the information submitted by the State does not show payment of the third installment to Mrs. Natividad Morales (single last name) and, therefore, it is critical that the State submit updated information on her situation. In this regard, it should be noted that she has been paid the first and second installments, as per the release documents previously submitted by the State. Moreover, the Court has verified that the heirs of Mr. Gumercindo Orellana have received, via a single payment, the full amount set in the Judgment as due and payable to him. * * * 34. That, as regards to the similar or identical names featured in the Judgment, the State explained that it made payment only to those persons who had been duly identified. It further noted that it made payment of the amount set by the Court, in three installments, to 270 persons, and indicated that, in those cases where payment had not been made, that was due to the fact that the relevant persons had failed to