92 266. As a result, as the Court has ordered in other cases, 318 it deems that the State should carry out a public act of acknowledgment of international responsibility regarding the facts of the current case, addressing the violations established in the present Judgment, and said act must take place in a public ceremony carried out by high-ranking national authorities and in the presence of the victims of the present case. The State should come to an agreement with the victims or their representatives regarding the manner in which said public act of acknowledgment is to take place, such as place and date. The act should be disseminated through the means of communication, and for its fulfillment, the State must comply within a year as of the legal notice of this Judgment. 267. Likewise, according to its obligation, and within one year, the State should unveil, in the SID building where the victims were detained, a plaque containing an inscription with their names, the period of time in which they were illegally detained there. 268. The Court does not consider that the harm caused by the SID, where the Center for National Advanced Studies for education in the Military is currently in operation, a functional destination related to State policy of human rights, has any relation to the facts of the case and the declared violations, and it is therefore not relevant to attend to the requests made by the representatives. 269. Concerning other requests made by the Commission, the Court notes that they were not presented in a timely manner, that is, when the case was submitted to this Tribunal. The mentioned requests are, therefore, time-barred, and will not be considered. ii. Publication of the judgment 270. The representatives requested that the State be ordered to publish the pertinent sections of the Judgment in the Official Gazette and in a newspaper of wide national circulation, as well as the entire Judgment on the web site of the Presidency of the Republic. The State did not refer to the matter. 271. The Court finds, in line with its reiterated jurisprudence319 on the matter at hand, that the State must publish, within a period of six months, as of the legal notice of this Judgment: a) only once, in the Official Gazette, this Judgment, with the respective names of each chapter and the corresponding sections –without footnotes; b) in a different newspaper of wide national circulation, and only once, the official summary of the present Judgment drafted by this Court; c) the entire Judgment, in an official website, which should be available for a period of one year.                                                          318 Cf. Case of Kawas Fernández V. Honduras. Merits, Reparations and Costs. Judgment of April 3, 2009 Series C No. 196, para. 202; Case of Rosendo Cantú et al., supra note 9, para. 226, and Case of Gomes Lund et al. (Guerrilha do Araguaia), supra note 16, para. 277. 319 Cf Case of Barrios Altos V. Perú. Reparations and Costs. Judgment of November 30, 2001. Series C No. 87, Punto Resolutivo 5.d); Case of Gomes Lund et al. (Guerrilha do Araguaia), supra note 16, para. 273, and Case of Cabrera García and Montiel Flores, supra note 16, para. 217.