place while they were in custody on January 25, 2013, with a high cost in human life, which reveal the persistence of the situation of extreme gravity and urgency. In addition, the Court has verified that the level of overcrowding has increased and that the deficient internal control and security conditions subsist, as well as the continuing entry into and possession of weapons within the prison. 15. In the circumstances of this matter, and while the State improves the detention conditions of the inmates, the Court must require, for the effects of these provisional measures, that the State eliminate, specifically, the risk of violent death and of attacks on personal integrity. To this end, the measures adopted must include those aimed directly at protecting the rights to life and integrity of the beneficiaries, in the context of both the relations among the inmates themselves and with the State agents, as well as those designed to eliminate these risks, particularly in relation to the deficient internal control and security conditions of the Penitentiary Center of the Central Occidental Region. 16. Lastly, the Court considers it essential that the State present a supplementary report, which should contain: (a) the names of the beneficiaries who were injured, the medical attention provided, and the conditions and place where they are at the present time; (b) the names of the beneficiaries who are deceased, and (c) the names of the beneficiaries who were transferred to other penitentiary centers, indicating the precise place to which they were transferred and whether the transfer was temporary or definitive. The Court emphasizes that it is necessary to guarantee the access of the representatives to the prisons covered by measures of protection, as well as the constructive participation of the State and of the representatives in the implementation of these provisional measures. 17. Based on all the above, it is in order to maintain the provisional measures in force and, consequently, the State has the obligation to protect the life and integrity of all the persons who are within the Penitentiary Center of the Central Occidental Region, of the persons who may enter the prison in the future as inmates, and of those who work there, as well as of those who enter the premises as visitors. 18. In conclusion, it is recalled that the measures remain in force that were adopted in the Matter of the Monagas Judicial Detention Center (“La Pica”); the Penitentiary Center of the Capital Region Yare I and Yare II (Yare Prison); the Penitentiary Center of the Central Occidental Region (Uribana Prison); the Capital Detention Center El Rodeo I and El Rodeo II; the Penitentiary Center de Aragua “Tocorón Prison”; the Ciudad Bolívar Judicial Detention Center “Vista Hermosa Prison,” and the Penitentiary Center of the Andean Region, as well as with regard to Humberto Prado and Marianela Sánchez Ortiz, her husband Hernán Antonio Bolívar, their son Anthony Alberto Bolívar Sánchez, and their daughter Andrea Antonela Bolívar Sánchez, and that the joinder of the processing of the provisional measures ordered in the Matters of certain Venezuelan Prisons subsists. THEREFORE: THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS, In exercise of the attributes conferred on it by Article 63(2) of the American Convention on Human Rights, and 27 and 31(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court,12 12 Rules of Procedure of the Inter-American Court approved at its eighty-fifth regular session held from November 16 to 28, 2009. 8