28 vehicle in which her son-in-law was kidnapped, pointing out that the paramilitary group of RP was responsible for what happened.74 98. Regarding the motives and identity of the alleged perpetrators of the attack, Héctor Manuel Álvarez Solano, son of Héctor Álvarez Sánchez, stated that he was aware of who they were, while he had a personal conversation with JP in which he stated that Manuel Guillermo Omeara, according to the paramilitaries, was a guerrilla and for that reason his death had taken place. Similarly, JP affirmed that the death of Héctor Álvarez Sánchez occurred as he was aware of such facts in relation to his brother-in-law.75 E. Displacement of the members of the Omeara and Álvarez families 99. On the morning of October 22, 1994, after the attack against Héctor Álvarez Sánchez and during his transfer to the Bucaramanga hospital, his daughter, Fabiola Álvarez Solano accompanied him and was forced to leave the municipality of Aguachica.76 100. Carmen Teresa Omeara Miraval, sister of Manuel Guillermo Omeara, also traveled from Aguachica that same day along with her nieces and nephews Elba Katherine, Manuel Guillermo and Claudia Marcela, all with the surnames Omeara Álvarez, children of Manuel Guillermo Omeara Miraval and Fabiola Álvarez Solano. They left for the city of Bucaramanga as a result of the constant threats after the attacks against their relatives and for fear of being victims of new violent episodes. In this regard, Carmen Omeara stated: when they attacked HÉCTOR ÁLVAREZ […] we had to leave the house at dawn because I don't know who told my mother [referring to Mrs. Zoila Miraval de Omeara], that someone came and told them that GUILLERMO's three children and I had to leave Aguachica immediately and we had to come to Bucaramanga, I don't know who it was, but my mother packed my suitcase at once and I had to leave that same night for Bucaramanga with my brother’s children, I never knew where that threat came from, but I had to run away from there and I stayed here [referring to the city of Bucaramanga] for about 6 months or so.77 F. Investigations into the attacks on Messrs. Omeara Carrascal, Omeara Miraval and Álvarez Solano78 101. This section describes, first, the relevant facts about the investigation of what happened to Noel Emiro Omeara Carrascal. Next, the relevant facts about the investigations of what happened to Manuel Guillermo Omeara Miraval are described, which involve different instances, namely: the ordinary criminal jurisdiction and the military criminal jurisdiction, as well as the disciplinary investigation. The relevant facts of the investigation regarding Héctor Álvarez Sánchez are then described. Finally, reference is made to the jurisdiction of Justice and Peace Proceedings to amend the statement of Elva María Solano de Álvarez of April 3, 2013, supra; Testimonial statement of Héctor Álvarez Sánchez, supra, and Report of the National Office of the Prosecutor General of February 10, 2003 (evidence file, annex 6 to the answering brief, fs. 9220 and 9221). 75 Testimonial statement of Héctor Manuel Álvarez Solano of October 31, 2012 (evidence file, annex 63 to the brief with pleadings, motions and evidence, fs. 2450 to 2452). In that same statement regarding Manuel Guillermo Omeara's assessment of being a "guerrilla", Mr. Álvarez Solano explained that "all of this has been unleashed as a consequence of [his] father's cattle being stolen and as a result, they came to the farm to say that they were collaborating in the recovery of the cattle, but that they had to give them money and [his] brother-in-law Manuel Guillermo insulted them and said that he was not going to give them any money”, and Statement by JP before the Delegate Prosecutor for Human Rights and IHL, of October 6, 2010, supra. 76 Statement by Fabiola Álvarez Solano rendered by affidavit presented before the Court, supra. 77 Witness statement of Carmen Teresa Omeara Miraval of August 17, 2010, supra. 78 A comprehensive detailed review of each investigation will not be undertaken, but rather, in each case, a review of the relevant central aspects regarding disputed points will be made; then, when this Court presents its considerations, other relevant facts will be pointed out. 74