68 257. In this case, the State has failed to comply with its obligation to adequately investigate the forced disappearance of Mr. Omeara Miraval, and nearly 24 years have passed since the events occurred, and there has been no clarification about the corresponding responsibilities or the events that occurred. Therefore, the Court considers that the State violated the right to truth to the detriment of Mr. Omeara Miraval's next of kin. In this case, as in others, said violation is part of the right of access to justice. D. Conclusion 258. The Inter-American Court considers that the State violated Articles 8(1) and 25(1) of the American Convention, in relation to Article 1(1) of the same treaty, to the detriment of Noel Emiro Omeara Carrascal, Manuel Guillermo Omeara Miraval294, Héctor Álvarez Sánchez, Luis Enrique Omeara Miraval, Aura Isabel Omeara Miraval, Noel Emiro Omeara Miraval, Araminta Omeara Miraval, Ricaurte Omeara Miraval, Eduardo Omeara Miraval, Zoila Rosa Omeara Miraval, Liliana Patricia Omeara Miraval, María Omeara Miraval, Carmen Teresa Omeara Miraval, Jaime Antonio Omeara Miraval, Elva María Solano de Álvarez, Judith Álvarez Solano, Miguel Ángel Álvarez Solano, Héctor Manuel Álvarez Solano, Clemencia Patricia Álvarez Solano, Ana Edith Álvarez de García, Fabiola Álvarez Solano, Manuel Guillermo Omeara Álvarez, Elba Katherine Omeara Álvarez, and Claudia Marcela Omeara Álvarez for the lack of a diligent investigation of the events that occurred to Noel Emiro Omeara Carrascal and Héctor Álvarez Sánchez. 259. The Court also considers that the State violated Articles 8(1) and 25(1) of the American Convention, in relation to Articles 1, 6 and 8 of the Inter-American Convention to Prevent and Punish Torture and I(b) of the Inter-American Convention on Disappearance Forced Persons, to the detriment of Luis Enrique Omeara Miraval, Aura Isabel Omeara Miraval, Noel Emiro Omeara Miraval, Araminta Omeara Miraval, Ricaurte Omeara Miraval, Eduardo Omeara Miraval, Zoila Rosa Omeara Miraval, Liliana Patricia Omeara Miraval, María Omeara Miraval, Carmen Teresa Omeara Miraval, Jaime Antonio Omeara Miraval, Fabiola Álvarez Solano, Manuel Guillermo Omeara Álvarez, Elba Katherine Omeara Álvarez, and Claudia Marcela Omeara Álvarez, for the lack of a diligent investigation of the events that occurred to Manuel Guillermo Omeara Miraval. 260. In addition, this Court considers that the State is responsible for the violation of the right of the relatives of the disappeared victim to know the truth. 261. The Court considers that according to the partial acknowledgment of responsibility, the State is responsible for the violation of the judicial guarantees and judicial protection enshrined in Articles 8(1) and 25(1) of the American Convention, in relation to Article 1(1) of the same instrument, to the detriment of Carmen Teresa Omeara Miraval, for not having diligently investigated the alleged threats she suffered. 262. Similarly, according to said partial acknowledgment of responsibility, the State is responsible for the violation of the right of movement and residence enshrined in Article 22(1) of the American Convention and the guarantee of a fair trial and judicial protection enshrined in Articles 8(1) and 25(1) therein, in relation to Article 1(1) of the same instrument, to the detriment of Carmen Teresa Omeara Miraval and Fabiola Álvarez Solano, and Elba Katherine Omeara Álvarez, Manuel Guillermo Omeara Álvarez and Claudia Marcela Omeara Álvarez, for not having diligently investigated the alleged displacement they suffered. Manuel Guillermo Omeara Miraval is a victim due to the State’s failure to comply with its duties, while he was alive, regarding the investigation of what happened to his father. 294