79 308. The Commission asked the Court to order the State to adopt measures to prevent the repetition of these events, and specifically “the strengthening of the mechanisms for the protection for family members and witnesses in investigations of human rights violations, and the strengthening of the investigative capacity of contexts and patterns of joint action between state agents and illegal armed groups.” 309. The State asked the Court not to consider the request of the representatives regarding the preparation of a memorial document and the raising of a plaque, since it considered, in its case, the issuance of a conviction and its proper publication were sufficient. Regarding the educational scholarships, it asked the Court to dispense with this measure, because these three people have already completed their university studies and this shows that their academic training has not been interrupted. The State argued that the other measures requested already exist at the domestic level and, therefore, there is no room for the Court to order them. He referred to the existence of the Program for the Protection of Witnesses, Victims, Participants in Criminal Proceedings and Officials of the Office of the National Attorney General, which is attached to the National Office of Protection and Assistance of the Office of the Attorney General. He also pointed out that with regard to measures aimed at investigating contexts, there is the National Directorate for Analysis and Contexts (DINAC) and the Justice and Peace Law provides for an investigative approach based on context analysis. 310. The Court finds the measure related to the educational scholarships inadmissible, since the need for them has not been proven, nor has the interruption of the studies of the people for whom they have been requested. With respect to the other measures of reparation requested, this Court considers that the issuance of this judgment and the reparations ordered therein are sufficient and appropriate. F. Compensation 311. The representatives requested that the State be ordered to compensate the victims, covering both pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage. They also requested that the amounts not be included in the sentence, due to the fear that the relatives of the victims have of being extorted. 312. The Commission asked the Court to order the State to “fully compensate the next of kin of Noel Emiro Omeara Carrascal, Manuel Guillermo Omeara Miraval, and Héctor Álvarez Sánchez,” including the compensation measures. 313. The State accepted, in accordance with its acknowledgment of responsibility, that the victims in this case must be compensated and provided an expert opinion to calculate the compensation that may be appropriate. F.2. Pecuniary Damages F.2.1. Consequential Damage 314. The representatives indicated the components of certain material damages suffered. As consequential damage,320 the relatives of Omeara Carrascal and Álvarez Sánchez incurred 320 The representatives also requested that the costs of proceedings before judicial authorities to denounce and start the search for Mr. Omeara Miraval be included as consequential damages. However, the Court finds that this item falls within the analysis of costs and expenses. The Court also considers that there are no specific receipts on the specific expenses incurred by Carmen Teresa Omeara Miraval, Fabiola Álvarez Solano, Manuel Guillermo Omeara