CEJIL

- Libreria
- Registrarse

I/A Court HR. Case of Sales Pimenta v. Brazil. Preliminary objections, merits, reparations, and costs. Judgment of June 30, 2022. Judgment adopted in San José, Costa Rica. Ricardo C. Pérez Manrique President Humberto Antonio Sierra Porto Eduardo Ferrer Mac-Gregor Poisot Nancy Hernández López Verónica Gómez Patricia Pérez Goldberg Pablo Saavedra Alessandri Registrar So ordered, Ricardo C. Pérez Manrique President Pablo Saavedra Alessandri Registrar 53

Seleccionar párrafo de destino3

● ● ●

Uwazi es desarrollado por
CEJIL
Libreria
Acceder

Información
14relaciones

Consejos de búsqueda

Buscar texto

Type something in the search box to get some results.

Tabla de Contenidos

I INTRODUCTION OF THE CASE AND CAUSE OF ACTION4
II PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE COURT5
III JURISDICTION7
IV PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS7
A. Lack of ratione temporis jurisdiction with respect to events that occurred prior to the date of recognition of the Court’s jurisdiction7
A.1. Arguments of the parties and the Commission7
A.2. Considerations of the Court8
B. Preliminary objection regarding the failure to exhaust domestic remedies8
B.1. Arguments of the parties and the Commission8
B.2. Considerations of the Court9
C. Lack of ratione materiae jurisdiction over the violation of the principle of subsidiarity (fourth instance objection)10
C.1. Arguments of the parties and the Commission10
C.2. Considerations of the Court10
V PRELIMINARY CONSIDERATIONS10
VI EVIDENCE 11
A. Admissibility of the documentary evidence11
B. Admissibility of the testimonial and expert evidence12
VII FACTS12
A. Context of violence and impunity related to land struggles in Brazil12
B. Background information15
C. Independent events after the recognition of the Court’s contentious jurisdiction19
VIII MERITS22
VIII-1 RIGHTS TO JUDICIAL GUARANTEES AND JUDICIAL PROTECTION, AS WELL AS THE RIGHT TO THE TRUTH, IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE OBLIGATION TO RESPECT AND ENSURE RIGHTS23
A. Arguments of the parties and of the Commission23
B. Considerations of the Court25
VIII-2 RIGHT TO PERSONAL INTEGRITY, IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE DUTY TO RESPECT AND ENSURE RIGHTS34
A. Arguments of the parties and of the Commission34
B. Considerations of the Court34
IX REPARATIONS36
A. Injured Party37
B. Obligation to investigate the facts and identify, prosecute, and, as appropriate, punish those responsible37
C. Measure of rehabilitation38
D. Measures of satisfaction39
E. Guarantees of non-repetition41
F. Compensation47
G. Costs and expenses49
H. Method of compliance with the payments ordered50
X OPERATIVE PARAGRAPHS51
THE COURT DECIDES:51
DECLARES,51
AND ESTABLISHES,51

Sales Pimenta. Sentencia de 30 de junio de 2022

Sentencia de la Corte IDH

Preview

Tipo

Costas
Excepciones Preliminares
Fondo
Reparaciones

Fecha: 30 jun 2022

Mecanismo

Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos

Número: C 454

País

Brasil

Firmantes

Eduardo Ferrer Mac-Gregor Poisot
Humberto Antonio Sierra Porto
Nancy Hernández López
Patricia Pérez Goldberg
Ricardo C. Pérez Manrique
Verónica Gómez

Documentos primarios

Sales Pimenta. Sentencia de 30 de junio de 2022.pdf
Spanish
ML TdC
Descargar Ver
Sales Pimenta. Judgment. June 30, 2022.pdf
English
Descargar Ver

Archivos de soporte

Sales Pimenta. Judgment. June 30, 2022.docx180.23 kB

Sales Pimenta. Sentencia de 30 de junio de 2022.docx234.41 kB

Sin referencias

References are parts of this document related with other documents and entities.

No existe etiqueta1
- Causa1
Documentos de la CorteIDH5
- Resolución de Presidencia de la CorteIDH1
- Audiencia2
- Sentencia de la Corte IDH1
- Resolución de la Corte IDH1
Mecanismo1
- Organismo1
País1
- País1
Firmantes6
- Juez/a y/o Comisionado/a6

Crear Referencia

Seleccionar tipo de relación

Relacionado a
CorteIDH
CIDH
Votos separados
Paises
Jueces intervinientes
País
Multi Select
Mecanismo
Firmantes
Sexo
Tipo
Firmante Voto separado
Estado
Descriptores
Geolocalización de los hechos del caso
Medidas de Protección

Consejos de búsqueda

Notificaciones

Estás al día

La actividad nueva se mostrará aquí.