6 15. That the representatives pointed out that the State has not forwarded any information on the publications ordered by the Judgment, despite the term granted for the compliance thereof has legally expired. As to the proposal to include special links in the most important newspapers of the country, they considered that the State must comply with what has been ordered in the Judgment. 16. That the Commission noticed that “regardless that additionally to the compliance with [this obligation] the State includes the above mentioned electronic link, […] it must comply with the Court order […], in the specific terms set forth in the Judgment.” However, it considered that it would be useful that the Judgment was available in the Internet pages of several sources of information. Based on the above, it considered that the State has not complied with its obligation as it appears in the Judgment. 17. That the Court observes that the term to issue the above mentioned publications expired on February 3, 2008, that is to say, more than a year and seven months ago, without there being any evidence in the case file that the above mentioned publications have been effected. On the other hand, regarding the request made by the State as to the setting of access links in the Internet pages of the most important newspapers of national circulation, the Court observes that it has not formally received said request in the instant case of monitoring of compliance, reason for which it shall not refer to the matter. Based on the above, the Court requests the State to supply information on the fulfillment of this reparation measure. * * * 18. That regarding the obligation to have a public ceremony of acknowledgement of international liability (operative paragraph ten of the Judgment), neither the State nor the representatives provided any information on the status of compliance with this reparation measure. 19. That the Commission emphasized the lack of information regarding this obligation. Therefore, it asked the Court to request the State the to forward the corresponding information. 20. That the term set forth for having the public ceremony of acknowledgment of liability was of six months from the notice of the Judgment and, consequently, it expired on February 3, 2008, that is to say, more than a year and seven months ago. The State has not forwarded any information on the proceedings carried out for the effective fulfillment of this obligation. Due to the above, the Court requests the State to adopt all the measures necessary for its compliance and to forward detailed and thorough information regarding this reparation measure.