to the Report on the Merits, were not included on the lists of dismissed employees. However, Juana Peña Rodríguez and Gudiel Quiñones Baldeón,31 who were identified with their two last names in different documents included in the record, are listed.32 The Court, thus, concludes that they are the same persons. With respect to Abelardo Zarazú Salazar, the Court finds that, although he is not included on the list of dismissed employees, the list contains Abelardo Zarazú Ruiz, who was also identified with this first name and last names in different documents in the record of the case.33 In the opinion of the Court, what might have occurred in this case is a minor inconsistency regarding the name included on the Commission’s list, which does not affect his correct identification. With respect to Carlos Arturo Cobeñas Torres, the representatives requested that he not be excluded without verifying whether Felix Cobeñas Periamache, who is one of the victims recognized in Dismissed Congressional Employees (Aguado Alfaro et al.) v. Peru, was mistakenly included in place of Mr. Cobeñas Torres. The Court finds that Mr. Cobeñas Periamache was not included on the Commission’s list of alleged victims. In addition, as the State informed, Mr. Cobeñas Torres was not on the list of dismissed employees in the record and, therefore, cannot be considered an alleged victim in this case. 58. With respect to the State’s argument that, during the processing of this case, the family members of the dismissed employees were not considered alleged victims, the Court finds that, as has been indicated (supra para. 55), the group of alleged victims is comprised of those persons indentified at the proper procedural moment by the Commission, with the exception of Ms. Carrillo Mantilla, about whom the pertinent considerations have already been made, and all of these persons are dismissed congressional employees. However, when presenting the respective powers of attorney, the representatives presented six powers by family members of alleged victims who had died during the proceedings of the case and, therefore, the Court considers that that group of persons acted in representation of their deceased family members. 31 Cf. Resolution 1303-“B”-92-CACL (evidence file, f. 7). The alleged victim “Juana Isabel Peña Rodríguez” is found in the following documents: Report 0022001-CERCC/CR of the Special Commission to Review the Collective Dismissals of the Congressional Personnel protected by Law 27487 (evidence file, f. 7); Communication sent on behalf of the petitioners to the InterAmerican Commission on December 19, 2000 (evidence file, f. 273); Communication on behalf of the petitioners sent to the Inter-American Commission on April 1, 2016 (evidence file, f. 620); List of the dismissed congressional employees attached to the brief of the State sent to the Inter-American Commission on February 1, 2017 (evidence file, f. 1017); Report 1300-2016-GFRCP-AAP-DRRHH/CR of the Functional Group Registry and Control of Congressional Personnel of December 30, 2016 (evidence file, f. 1025); Technical Administrative Report 815-201fi-GflitCP-AAP-DRRHH/CR of the Functional Group Registry and Control of Congressional Personnel of December 12, 2016 (evidence file, f. 1098); Note 363-2017-ADM-CDG-USJ-CSJLI-PJ of the Superior Court of Lima of February 28, 2017 (evidence file, f. 1231); Certificate of the file of the Superior Court of Lima of February 28, 2017 (evidence file, fs. 1510 to 1518) and document regarding the list of former congressional employees who obtained reparations from the State (evidence file, f. 2488). The alleged victim “Gudiel Máximo Quiñónez Baldeón” is found in the following documents: Communication sent on behalf of the petitioners to the Inter-American Commission on December 19, 2000 (evidence file, f. 459); Communication sent on behalf of the petitioners to the Inter-American Commission on April 1, 2016 (evidence file, f. 621); Report 1300-2016-GFRCP-AAP-DRRHH/CR of the Functional Group Registry and Control of Congressional Personnel of December 30, 2016 (evidence file, f. 1026); Technical Administrative Report 852-2016-GflrtCPAAP-DRRHH/CR of the Functional Group Registry and Control of Congressional Personnel of December 12, 2016 (evidence file, f. 1131); Note 363-2017-ADM-CDG-USJ-CSJLI-PJ of the Superior Court of Lima of February 28, 2017 (evidence file, f. 1231); Report 72-2017-MTPE/2-ST of the Ministry of Work and Promotion of Employment of February 21 2017 (evidence file, f. 1789); Document regarding the list of former congressional employees who obtained reparations from the State (evidence file, f. 2482). Finally, the alleged victim provided a power of representation (evidence file, fs. 2323 to 2325). 32 33 The alleged victim “Abelardo Zarazú Ruiz” is found in the following documents: Communication sent on behalf of the petitioners to the Inter-American Commission on April 1, 2016 (evidence file, f. 624); List of the dismissed congressional employees attached to the State’s brief to the Commission of February 1, 2017 (evidence file, f. 1021) and Note 363-2017-ADM-CDG-USJ-CSJLI-PJ of the Superior Court of Lima of February 28, 2017 (evidence file, f. 1238). 17