28. The Court also received documents attached to the final written arguments presented by the State 30 and the representatives.31 The Commission objected to part of the annexes to the State’s final written arguments and indicated that it had no observations on the annexes of the alleged victim’s representatives. The State noted that it had no objection to the documents that accompanied the representatives' final arguments. The latter did not submit observations. 29. In relation to the documents attached as annexes A and B to the representatives’ final written arguments, the Court notes that they are documents issued after the presentation of the brief of pleadings and motions and, therefore, constitute evidence of supervening facts. Furthermore, it considers them useful for understanding part of the reparation measures requested by the representatives. In view of the above, said documents are admissible under the terms of Article 57(2) of the Rules of Procedure. 30. Regarding the annexes to the final written arguments of Bolivia, the Commission argued that annexes 1 to 6 were available prior to the date of presentation of the State's answering brief and requested that said documentation not be admitted. The Court agrees with the Commission, since the documents that correspond to annexes 1 to 6, presented by the State, are dated prior to the answering brief, and are therefore inadmissible. The other annexes constitute evidence of supervening facts as they were issued after the presentation of the answering brief. Additionally, some contain information requested by the judges in the public hearing, therefore, the Court admits them. B. Admissibility of witness and expert evidence 31. The Court considers it pertinent to admit the statements made in public hearing,32, as well as the statements made before a notary public33 as long as they conform to the purpose defined by the President in the order for their receipt.34 together with the briefs submitted in the case, pleadings and motions or answering, as appropriate, and evidence submitted outside of these procedural opportunities is not admissible, except for the objections established in the aforementioned article 57(2) of the Rules of Procedure (namely, force majeure, serious impediment) or unless it were a supervening event, that is, one that occurred after the aforementioned procedural moments. Cf. Case of Barrios Family v. Venezuela. Merits, Reparations and Costs. Judgment of November 24, 2011. Series C No. 237, paras. 17 and 18, and Case of Aroca Palma et al. v. Ecuador. Preliminary Objection, Merits, Reparations and Costs. Judgment of November 8, 2022. Series C No. 471, para. 26. 30 Annex 1: Note dated November 2, 2020, signed by Dr. M.R.C.; Annex 2: Certificate as a speaker at the Forum on Sexual Violence from a Public Health Perspective, held on June 5, 2009; Annex 3: Certificate for having been part of the Participatory Action Research process "Building together a route for the integrated and systematized management of cases of sexual violence against children and adolescents"; Annex 4: Note dated October 8, 2010, signed by the Director of the Legal Office for Women; Annex 5: Note FGE/.JN.RRHH. No. 073/2021 of February 1, 2021; Annex 6: CITE:FGE/IDIF/AFN00114/2021 of January 29 of 2021; Annex 7: CITEJDN Report N' 438/2022 of March 21, 2022, issued by the Office of the Ombudsman for Children and Adolescents of the Autonomous Municipal Government of Cochabamba; Annex 8: Report FGE/DRGYJ348 N'035/2022 of 29 March 2022; Annex 9: MJTI Report - VIO N' 13/2022 of March 14, 2022; Annex 10: FEG/DRGYJ348 Report N' 22/2022 of March 14, 2022; Annex 11: Report N' 19 /2022, issued by the Crime-Statistics Analysis Division of the Bolivian Police; Annex 12: Curriculum of the School of Judges of the State of Bolivia; Annex 13: Detail of the instruments used by the different actors who deal with cases of violence against children and adolescents; Annex 14: Document titled “Information regarding the Case of Angulo Losada v. Bolivia processed before the Inter-American Court of Human Rights”, prepared by the Ministry of Education, and Annex 15: Note GM-DGAJ-UAJI-Cs-970/2022 of April 7, 2022. 31 Annex A: Book: "Proposal for the Plurinational State of Bolivia to generate safe spaces that allow Children and Adolescents to grow and develop without the risk of experiencing sexual violence and to improve access to justice", and Annex B: Book: "The culture of incest and the crime of incestuous rape by adults in the family of children and adolescents." 32 In a public hearing, the Court received the statements of the alleged victim, Brisa De Angulo Losada, the witness Luz Stella Losada and the expert Sylvia Mesa Peluffo, proposed by the representatives, and of the expert Miguel Cillero Bruñol, proposed by the Inter-American Commission. 33 The Court received the statements made before a notary public (affidavit) from the witness José Miguel de Angulo and the witness María Leonor Oviedo Bellott, and from the experts Dubravka Šimonović and María Elena Attard Bellido, proposed by the representatives, and from the prosecutor N.T.A, proposed by the state. 34 The purpose of these declarations is established in the Order of the President of the Inter-American Court issued on February 17, 2022. Available in Spanish at:https://www.corteidh.or.cr/docs/asuntos/angulo_losada_17_02_22.pdf. 11