than fifteen years; therefore the Court endorses this measure of reparation under the terms agreed by the parties. E.1.b) Award of “educational scholarships” 81. In the section entitled “Reparation for non-pecuniary damage and measures of satisfaction” of the friendly settlement agreement, the State “pledge[d] to guarantee the education of the victims until the completion of their university or technical studies, according to their interests.” To this end, “the Interior Ministry [will pay for educational scholarships], through the Trust for the Fulfillment of Human Rights Obligations, based on the Trust’s Rules of Operation.” The friendly settlement agreement also stated that “[the] victims agree to start or resume their studies within three years of the notification of [this] judgment.” 82. Furthermore, as part of the “reparations awarded in good faith” to the victims’ families (supra para. 68), Mexico agreed to guarantee [through the provision of an academic scholarship] the education of [… the daughter of Mr. Santiago Sánchez Silvestre], until she completes her university or technical studies, according to her expressed interests.” This scholarship “will be awarded in full each year, provided that she submits certification for the school year immediately preceding the one for which she is seeking the scholarship.” Moreover, the State added that “[the] calculation of the scholarship awarded will be determined by the Rules of Operation of the Trust for the Fulfillment of Human Rights Obligations,” and that “compliance with this measure will be supervised by the Unit for the Defense of Human Rights of the Interior Ministry.” 83. The Court appreciates Mexico’s commitment to ensure that the victims receive training for a profession or trade, to which the victims did not have access because they were deprived of liberty, and ratifies those measures under the terms agreed by the parties. E.1.c) Public act of acknowledgment of international responsibility 84. The section entitled “Reparation for non-pecuniary damage and measures of satisfaction” of the friendly settlement agreement stipulates that “with the prior and informed consent of the victims and their representatives, [the State] will organize a public act of apology and acknowledgement of responsibility, to be carried out by national government authorities of a rank not lower than Under-Secretary of State, in which “representatives of the Federal Judicial Authority, the Minister of the Interior and the Minister of Foreign Relations will participate.” Furthermore, the parties agreed that the act “should be held within six months of notification of [this] judgment.” 85. The Court appreciates the State’s willingness to organize a public act of apology and acknowledgement of its international responsibility, and therefore endorses this measure under the terms agreed by the parties. Moreover, as it has in other cases, 95 the Court considers that during this act reference should be made to the facts and human rights violations declared in this Judgment. E.1.d) Publication of this Judgment 86. In the section entitled “guarantees of non-repetition” of the friendly settlement agreement, the State “agree [d] to publish, once only, in the Official Gazette of the Federation and in another newspaper with wide national circulation, the official summary of the Judgment 95 Cf. Case of Cantoral Benavides v. Peru. Reparations and Costs, supra note 88, para. 81; Case of Nadege Dorzema et al. v. Dominican Republic, supra note 90, para. 265 and Case of Luna López v. Honduras, supra note 84, para. 227. 25