psychiatric sufferings endured by the relatives of Mr. Núñez Naranjo (supra para. 127). As a result, the Court considers that the State must provide, free of charge, through its specialized health institutions and immediately the appropriate and effective psychological and/or psychiatric treatment that victims may require, with prior informed consent and for as long as necessary, including the free provision of any necessary medications, taking into account the conditions of each beneficiary. Furthermore, the respective treatments should be provided, insomuch as possible, at the centers chosen by the victims. For this purpose, the victims have a term of six months, counted from the notification of this judgment, to request said treatment from the State.189 When providing psychological and/or psychiatric treatment, the particular circumstances and needs of each victim must also be considered, based on what is agreed with each of them and following an individual evaluation. In turn, the State will have a term of three months after receiving such request to effectively provide the requested psychological and/or psychiatric care. E. Measures of Satisfaction E.1 Publication of the Judgment 156. The Commission did not request the publication of the judgment herein. 157. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Court orders, as it has done in other cases,190 that the State publish, within a term of six months from the notification of this judgment, in a legible and adequate font size: a) the official summary of this judgment prepared by the Court, once, in the Official Gazette, using a legible and adequate font size; b) the official summary of this judgment prepared by the Court, once, in a newspaper with wide national circulation, using a legible and adequate font size, c) this judgment in its entirety, made available for one year, on an official National Government website, in a manner accessible to the public and from the home page of the website. Similarly, within that same term, the State must make the Court's judgment public by posting on the official social media account of the Presidency of the Republic. Such postis must indicate that the Inter-American Court has issued a judgment herein declaring the international responsibility of the State, provide the link where the full text can be accessed directly, and remain available for a period of one year. This post must be made at least five times, during business hours, and remain posted on the respective profile on those social networks. The State must inform this Court immediately once it proceeds to make each of the ordered posts, regardless of the oneyear term it has to present its first report, as provided in operative paragraph 13 of this judgment. E.2 Act of public acknowledgement of responsibility 158. The Commission requested the establishment and dissemination of the historical truth of the events. 159. The representative and the State did not specifically address this request. 160. On multiple occasions, this Court has ordered an act of public acknowledgment of State responsibility, in reparation for the victims and as a guarantee of non-repetition, in line with the Cf. Case of Rosendo Cantú et al. v. Mexico. Preliminary Objection, Merits, Reparations, and Costs. Judgment of August 31, 2010. Series C No. 216, para. 253, and Case of Flores Bedregal et al. v. Bolivia, supra, para. 189. 190 Cf. Case of Cantoral Benavides v. Peru. Reparations and Costs. Judgment of December 3, 2001. Series C No. 88, para. 79, and Case of Olivera Fuentes v. Peru, supra, para. 145. 189 -43-