judicial guarantees or the right to judicial protection, and that this measure was not recommended by the Commission. Regarding the request for a public act of acknowledgment of responsibility, it claimed that if the Court declares any violation of the Convention, the issuing of the judgment and the reparations that may be ordered therein would be sufficient and adequate, so this order would not be necessary. Lastly, regarding the trainings requested by the representative, it claimed that it has been duly complying with its international obligations regarding the implementation of human rights courses and programs within the armed forces. Based on the foregoing, it pointed out several trainings provided by the Center for International Humanitarian Law and Human Rights of the Ministry of Defense of Peru, and requested that the measures requested by the representative not be ordered. 235. Regarding the measures of non-repetition requested by the Inter-American Commission, the Court does not consider pertinent to order them, given that there is no causal nexus between them and the violations declared in the instant case, considering that the Court did not find a violation of Article 2 of the Convention, or that the violations declared had a structural cause or were part of a general context. 236. Regarding the request to order human rights training for instructors and recruits that are in the military service, the Court notes that it has already ordered the State of Peru to carry out permanent training on human rights to those officers, as well as other persons in charge of justice administration, in the cases of La Cantuta, 198 Anzualdo Castro, 199 Osorio Rivera 200 and Espinoza Gonzales.201 In this regard, by recalling that training, as a system of continuous education, must be permanent in order to fulfill its goal, the Court considers it unnecessary to order once again the implementation of training and education programs, which is already subject to the monitoring of compliance with judgments in the aforementioned cases. 197F 198F 19F 20 237. Lastly, regarding the requests of the representative to perform a public act of acknowledgment of responsibility and to investigate the behavior of public servants related to the procedural and investigative irregularities against the victim, the Court considers that the issuing of this judgment and the reparations ordered in this chapter are sufficient and adequate to redress the violations suffered by the victim and does not consider it necessary to order those measures. E. Compensation E.1. Pecuniary damages 238. The Commission requested the Court to order the State to provide comprehensive reparation to the victim through monetary compensation that includes the material damages caused. 239. The representative indicated that, regarding lost wages, the amount that he stopped receiving from the lieutenant rank to the Brigade General rank in the Army of Peru, calculated from the date of the incident, September 5, 1994, to date, plus interest, amounts to PEN 2,000,000.00 (two million Peruvian soles) approximately. Regarding consequential damages, it indicated that taking into account that the victim suffered the loss of exercise of his professional calling, the deprivation of that value as part of his patrimony and expectations, and considering the academic level reached and the time elapsed since the facts occurred, it is necessary to assess the placement that he had in the merit order of the Third Position of the Cavalry Arms (“Tercer Puesto del Arma de Caballería”) in the intermediate level, for promotion to the immediately Cf. Case of La Cantuta v. Peru, para. 240. Cf. Case of Anzualdo Castro v. Peru, para. 193. 200 Cf. Case of Osorio Rivera and family v. Peru, para. 274. 201 Cf. Case of Espinoza Gonzáles v. Peru, para. 327, and Case of Tarazona Arrieta et al. v. Peru, para. 186; Case of the Miguel Castro Castro Prison v. Peru, para. 452. 198 199 52