3. To reject the State’s preliminary objection regarding the alleged infringement of the right to defend itself, under the terms of paragraphs 29 and 30 of this judgment. DECLARES: unanimously, that: 4. The State is responsible for the violation of Article 8(4) of the American Convention in relation to the ordinary criminal proceedings and military criminal proceedings, pursuant to paragraphs 87 to 120 of this judgment. 5. The State is responsible for the violation of the right to receive prior notification in detail of the charges against him, enshrined in Article 8(2)(b) of the Convention, in relation to Article 1(1) thereof, to the detriment of Mr. Rosadio Villavicencio, in the ordinary criminal proceedings, military disciplinary proceedings and military criminal proceedings, pursuant to paragraphs 125 to 137 of this judgment. 6. The State is responsible for the violation of the right to be assisted by legal counsel, enshrined in Articles 8(2)(d) and 8(2)(e) of the Convention, in relation to Article 1(1) thereof, to the detriment of Mr. Rosadio Villavicencio, in the disciplinary proceedings, pursuant to paragraphs 142 to 145 of this judgment. 7. The State is responsible for the violation of the right to a hearing and the right to defend oneself, enshrined in Articles 8(1) and 8(2)(c) of the Convention, to the detriment of Mr. Rosadio Villavicencio, in the disciplinary proceedings, pursuant to paragraphs 146 to 163 of this judgment. 8. The State is responsible for the violation of the duty to provide grounds, enshrined in Article 8(1) of the Convention, to the detriment of Mr. Rosadio Villavicencio, in the disciplinary proceedings, pursuant to paraphs 154 to 156 of this judgment. 9. The State is responsible for the violation of the right to be assisted by legal counsel and the right to defend oneself, enshrined in Articles 8(2)(c) and 8(2)(e) of the American Convention, in relation to Article 1(1) thereof, in the ordinary criminal proceedings, to the detriment of Mr. Rosadio Villavicencio, pursuant to paragraphs 173 to 179 of this judgment. 10. The State is responsible for the violation of the right to be judged by an impartial tribunal, enshrined in Article 8(1) of the Convention, in relation to Article 1(1) thereof, in the military criminal proceedings, to the detriment of Mr. Rosadio Villavicencio, pursuant to paragraphs 186 to 189 of this judgment. 11. The State is responsible for the violation of Articles 7(1), 7(3), 7(5) and 8(2) of the Convention, in relation to Article 1(1) thereof, to the detriment of Mr. Rosadio Villavicencio, pursuant to paragraphs 199 to 217 of this judgment. 12. The State is not responsible for the violation of Article 8(4) of the American Convention, in relation to the ordinary criminal proceedings and the disciplinary proceedings, pursuant to paragraphs 110 to 116 of this judgment. 13. The State is not responsible for the violation of Article 8(4) of the American Convention, in relation to the military criminal proceedings and the disciplinary proceedings, pursuant to paragraphs 117 to 119 of this judgment. 57

Seleccionar párrafo de destino3