has been signed by the parties to the dispute, who have had an opportunity to present their observations, that it puts an end to the dispute on the facts, rights and reparations, and that its content is compatible with the object and purpose of the Convention. Consequently, by means of this judgment the Court endorses the agreement reached by the parties. 114. The agreed measures of reparation are included in the endorsement of the friendly settlement agreement. Nevertheless, the Court will analyze them in order to determine their scope and means of execution, in light of the criteria established in its case law and in relation to the nature, object and purpose of the obligation to make full reparation for the harm caused to the victims. 152 Therefore, the agreed measures of reparation must be implemented in accordance with the terms of this judgment, as follows. VIII. REPARATIONS (Application of Article 63(1) of the American Convention) 115. In the friendly settlement agreement, the State and the representatives agreed to provide comprehensive reparation for the victims through a series of measures for which they requested the Court’s endorsement and its supervision of compliance. The various measures of reparation established by the parties in the friendly settlement agreement are described below. 153 The Court notes that some of the agreed measures have already begun to be implemented, which does not prevent the State from ensuring that these comply fully with the terms established in the agreement. A. Measures of restitution and satisfaction A.1. Comprehensive and specialized medical and psychological care for victims and their families, including rehabilitation treatment 116. In the friendly settlement agreement, the State agreed to the following: The State undertakes to provide all victims with comprehensive and specialized medical and psychological treatment of high quality, free of charge, so that they can enjoy the highest possible level of health in the national public health system. The State recognizes its obligation to provide medical treatment free of charge including, as a minimum, medical consultations, as well as the provision of the required medicines, prostheses or other devices necessary for the victims to lead a decent life. This also includes access to other specialized medical instruments or equipment that the victims may need. Treatment shall begin immediately and shall be provided for as long as necessary to restore the health and integrity of the victims. It shall also include the adoption of relevant measures to achieve the full integration into society of all victims living with disabilities, including the necessary rehabilitation treatment to ensure their inclusive social development. The required treatments shall be implemented with the prior informed consent of each patient, based on an individualized and specialized medical assessment and taking into account their particularities. Cf. Case of Velásquez Rodríguez. Reparations and costs. Judgment of July 21, 1989. Series C No. 7, paras. 25 to 27; Case of Escaleras Mejía et al. v. Honduras, supra, para. 82. 152 As agreed by the parties, the Court will not mention the monetary sums that the State agreed to pay the victims and their families as reparation, nor those that correspond to the Miskito organizations for costs and expenses. 153 39