concerning the nature and scope of the obligation to make reparation, in order to establish measures to redress the harm caused.437 A. Injured party 270. This Court considers that, pursuant to Article 63(1) of the Convention, anyone who has been declared a victim of the violation of any right recognized therein is the injured party. Therefore, the Court considers that Manuela, her mother, her father and her two sons are the “injured party” and, as victims of the violations declared in Chapter VIII, they will be considered beneficiaries of the reparations ordered by the Court. B. Measures of satisfaction B.1 Publication of the judgment 271. The representatives asked the Court to order the State to publish the official summary of the judgment “in the Official Gazette, and a national newspaper with widespread circulation, and on the websites of the Attorney General’s Office, the Public Defenders’ Unit of the Attorney General’s Office, the Ministry of Education, the Human Rights Council of the Presidency, the Ministry of Justice and Public Security, the General Directorate of Prisons, and the Ministry of Public Health.” They also asked that the State translate the content of the judgment “into an easy-to-read format to allow it to be understood by Manuela’s family and others who do not have access to formal education. 272. The State indicated its willingness to publish the official summary of the judgment “in the Official Gazette and in a national newspaper, as well as on the institutional websites of the domestic institutions directly linked to the facts of the case within the framework of internal competences.” 273. The Court establishes, as it has in other cases,438 that the State must publish, within six months of notification of the judgment: (a) the official summary of the judgment prepared by the Court, once, in the Official Gazette and in a national newspaper with widespread circulation, in an adequate and legible font, and (b) this judgment in its entirety, available for at least one year, on the official websites of the Attorney General’s Office, the Public Defenders’ Unit of the Attorney General’s Office, the Ministry of Education, the Human Rights Council of the Presidency, the Ministry of Justice and Public Security, the General Directorate of Prisons, and the Ministry of Public Health, in a manner that is accessible to the public from the initial page of the websites. 274. The State must advise the Court immediately it has made each of the publications ordered, regardless of the one-year time frame for presenting its first report established in the operative paragraphs of this judgment. B.2 Public act to acknowledge international responsibility 275. The representatives asked that the State “organize a public act to acknowledge international responsibility and make a public apology in relation to the facts of this case.” The State did not comment on this request. Cf. Case of Velásquez Rodríguez v. Honduras. Reparations and costs, supra, paras. 25 and 26, and Case of Almeida v. Argentina. Merits, reparations and costs. Judgment of November 17, 2020. Series C No. 416, para. 57. 437 Cf. Case of Cantoral Benavides v. Peru. Reparations and costs. Judgment of December 3, 2001. Series C No. 88, para. 79, and Case of Garzón Guzmán et al. v. Ecuador, supra, para. 117. 438 76