of Human Rights; 18 7) Renace, San Luis Potosí Chapter A.C.; 19 8) Sergio Villa Ramos; 20 9) the Permanent Human Rights Seminar of the Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México 21; 10) Sofía Margarita Miranda and Jorge Adrián Cruz; 22 11) Emmanuel Medina Zepeda; 23 12) Intersecta Organización para la Igualdad A.C. 24; 13) Innocence Project, Argentina; 25 14) the Human Rights Commission of Mexico City; 26 15) Minerva Calderón Legal Clinic 27; 16) Centro de Intervención Pedagógica para la Justicia Social Margarita Neri A.C.; 28 17) Miguel Agustín Pro Juárez Human Rights Center; 29 and 18) Roberto Borges Zurita. 30 13. Final written arguments and observations. On September 29, 2022, the Commission submitted its final written observations, and the State and the representatives forwarded their final written arguments. On October 17, 2022, the representatives submitted their observations on the annexes presented by the State in its final written arguments, the State submitted its observations on the 18 The brief signed by María Elisa Franco Martín del Campo, Patricia González Rodríguez, Leici López Villalobos, Luna Mancimi, Roberto Ochoa Romero and Jaime Eduardo Torres, regarding: a) the measure of arraigo from the perspective of criminal procedural law; b) the constitutional and legal framework for the recognition of arraigo in Mexico, and c) an approach to the concept of arraigo in the Mexican amparo system. 19 The brief signed by José Mario of the Garza Marroquín, president of Renace, San Luis Potosí Chapter A.C., refers to factual and legal considerations in the case of García Rodríguez et al. v. Mexico. The brief signed by Moisés Augusto Montiel Mogollón, Miguel Ángel Córdova Álvarez, René Cosme Limón, Sergio Villa Ramos and Gabriel José Ortiz Crespo, on legal situations related to constitutional restrictions on human rights recognized by the American Convention on Human Rights and their de facto and de jure prevalence in Mexico’s domestic legal system in breach of the Mexican State’s treaty-based obligations of protection and guarantee, based on the constitutional reform of 2011. 20 21 The brief signed by Cristian Miguel Acosta García, Britto Maleni Díaz, Jessica Bárcenas Santos, Sandra Espinosa Rizo, Saúl Alarcón Lara Luis, Andrés David Cuellar Lugo, Sara Elena Faur Ramírez, Joaquín Fuentes Jurado, Nuria Gil Serra, Gustavo Gutiérrez Bazán, Jimena Mendoza, Ximena López, Gerardo Mata, Demian Rubio, Karla Sánchez, Alejandra Suárez and Valdespino Saavedra, regarding arraigo and mandatory pretrial detention in relation to control of conventionality. The brief signed by Jorge Adrián Cruz Flores and Sofía Margarita Miranda Espinosa refers to the alleged misuse of power in the case of Daniel García Rodríguez. 22 23 The brief signed by Emmanuel Medina Zepeda on the Supreme Court’s doctrine refers to the measure of mandatory pretrial detention. 24 The brief signed by Estefanía Vela Barba, Adriana E. Ortega Arriaga, Regina Isabel Mediana Rosales, María Fernanda Torres Montañez, Haydeé Gómez Avilez, Nicole Huete Guevara, Gabriela García Gorbeta and Elsa Ramos Mecott, regarding: a) the legal framework for mandatory pretrial detention, b) an account of its constitutional history, and c) information on pretrial detention in Mexico, from the most up-to-date State sources on the matter. 25 The brief signed by Camila Brenda Calvo and Carlos Manuel Garrido regarding the alleged violations of due process committed by the state of Mexico against the victims. 26 The brief signed by Nashieli Ramírez, President of the Human Rights Commission of Mexico City on the alleged non-conformity with the Convention of arraigo and mandatory pretrial detention. 27 The brief signed by Daniel Torres Parra, Jocelynn Pérez Aldana, Daniela Itzel Jiménez Cortes, Jesús Joaquín Sánchez Cedillo, María del Rosario Arrambide González, María Fernanda Cobo Armijo, Mónica Hernández Frayre and Leilani Hernández, on the system of mandatory pretrial detention in Mexico and the alleged non-conformity with the Convention of its imposition‚ review and change in the context of the case “García Rodríguez and Reyes Alpízar v. Mexico.” 28 The brief signed by Misael de la Rosa García containing arguments that seek to contribute to a settlement in the case of García Rodríguez and Alpízar Ortiz v. Mexico. 29 The brief signed by Jorge Santiago Aguirre Espinosa on the obligation of the Mexican authorities to exclude evidence obtained under torture, or cruel and inhuman treatment or other acts of coercion in criminal proceedings, in accordance with domestic rules and standards on the matter. The brief signed by Roberto Borges Zurita, professor at the Universidad Autónoma de Tlaxcala, on: a) the concept of arraigo and mandatory pretrial detention in Mexico; b) certain State practices that he believes should be brought to the attention of the Court, and c) the rights that he considers were violated by the state of Mexico in the Case of Tzompaxtle Tecpile et al. v. Mexico, with the aim that this document will provide an a subsequenti vision of criminal policy in order to prevent the authorities and state agents from committing human rights violations. 30 -7-