4 high cost it implies. According to the representative, the State had proposed the hiring of independent services on its account, which was accepted by the beneficiary, however, after the two first charges, none have been covered by the State. 9. That regarding the beneficiary’s alleged absences from her place of residence and the negative to accept police escort, the representative stated that “[i]t is logical and understandable, that if the agents in charge of the care and material protection of Mrs. Mery Naranjo, are the originators of threats against her life and personal integrity, the beneficiary abstains from informing the Police of her permanent location” and that if the State would have provided the transportation and bodyguards requested on several occasions, it would know the permanent location of Mrs. Naranjo. 10. That in its observations, the Inter-American Commission stated that it is awaiting the information that the State may provide with regard to the protection measures actually agreed on and implemented in the light of the Court’s Orders. 11. That the State must adopt in an effective manner the measures addressed to protecting the life and personal integrity of Mrs. Mery Narajo and her next of kin, especially if it is a measure proposed by the State itself and accepted by the beneficiaries. In the present matter there is no evidence that Colombia has distorted the affirmation made by the representative regarding the lack of payment of the car with private bodyguards hired by Mrs. Mery Naranjo. This situation compromises the effectiveness of the beneficiary’s protection and security measures, reason for which it requires an immediate response from the State. 12. That for the adequate implementation of the provisional measures, the State must adopt all the necessary and adequate protection measures at the margin of the agreement regarding the hiring of private bodyguards for Mrs. Mery Naranjo. These measures must be agreed on with complete participation of the beneficiaries in their planning and implementation, as stated by the Court in the mentioned Order (supra Having Seen Paragraph 2), which means that all the parties must propose and agree on the measures if any of them considers that the existing ones are not adequate. Besides, the Court reiterates to the State that the protection must not be offered by the “security units” that, according to the beneficiaries, were involved in the facts reported, thus the appointment of the same should be done with the participation of the beneficiaries or their representative (supra Having Seen Paragraph 2). 13. That based on the above it is necessary that the Tribunal receive more information from the parties regarding the current status of the measures adopted with regard to this matter, in order to supervise the correct implementation of these provisional measures. * * * 14. That with regard to the protection of the life and personal integrity of Mrs. María Socorro Mosquera Londoño, the State informed that, to the effect that this beneficiary return to her home, there are two police units placed outside of what is considered her residence and that of her family unit, and that motorized reaction units are present 24 hours a day in the sector of La Independencia maintaining control of the 13th County, area where the beneficiary supposedly lives. The State also indicated that in compliance of the provisional measures ordered by the Court it maintains a fixed security unit, which consists