45 164. If for reasons attributable to the beneficiaries of the compensations, it was not possible for them to receive the payment within the term indicated (supra para. 139, 140 and 146), the State shall deposit the said amounts in favor of the beneficiaries in an account or a certificate of deposit of a solvent Ecuadorian banking institution, under the most favorable financial conditions allowed by the legislation and banking practice. If the compensation has not been claimed after ten years, the amounts shall be returned to the State, with any interest accrued. 165. The payment ordered as compensation for costs and expenses incurred representatives throughout the said proceedings shall be made directly to the CEDUH. by the 166. The amounts set forth in the present Judgment as compensations and reimbursement of costs and expenses may not be affected or made conditional by tax laws currently in force or to take effect in the future. Therefore, they shall be fully paid to the beneficiaries as set froth in the preset Judgment. 167. Should the State falls behind, it shall pay interests over the amount due, corresponding to banking default interest rates in Ecuador. 168. In accordance with its constant practice, the Court retains its authority, inherent to its functions and derived from Article 65 of the American Convention, to monitor full execution of this Judgment. The instant case shall be closed once the State has fully complied with the provisions ordered herein. Within one year from the notification of the instant Judgment, Ecuador shall submit a report to the Court on the measures adopted in compliance with this Judgment. X OPERATIVE PARAGRAPHS 169. Therefore, THE COURT DECLARES: Unanimously that: 1. It accepts the partial aknowledgement of international responsibility made by the State for the violation of the rights to judicial guarantees and judicial protection enshrined in Articles 8(1) and 25 of the American Convention on Human Rights, and for failing to fulfill its obligations regarding the suspension of guarantees established in Article 27 of the American Convention on Human Rights, as set forth in paragraphs 8 to 31 of the present Judgment. 2. The State failed to fulfill its obligations regarding the suspension of guarantees, established in Article 27(1), 27(2) and 27(3) of the American Convention on Human Rights, in conjunction with its obligations to respect rights and to adopt domestic measures with regard to the rights to life, judicial guarantees and judicial protection, respectively enshrined in Articles 1(1), 2, 4, 8(1) and 25 of the said Convention, as set forth in paragraphs 42 to 71 of the present Judgment. 3. The State violated the right to life enshrined in Article 4(1) of the American Convention on Human Rights, in conjunction with its obligations to respect and ensure the rights recognized therein established in Article 1(1) of the said Convention, for the arbitrary deprivation of the life of Mr. Wilmer Zambrano Vélez, Mr. Segundo Olmedo Caicedo Cobeña and Mr. José Miguel Caicedo