4 • in Siuna, by Radio Stereo Siuna, from June 16 to July 16, 2006, in Spanish and Mayagna. Regarding the foregoing, the State of Nicaragua forwarded the receipts for the payments made to such radio stations. Furthermore, the State pointed out that the translation of the Judgment into the above languages as ordered by the Court had been made jointly with the representatives of YATAMA and that the broadcast of the Judgment in the Rama language was still pending. 10. The representatives pointed out that though “receipts showing broadcasting services have been submitted, [they] do not indicate the date, time [or] intervals […] at which such broadcasts were made, nor have recordings thereof been submit[ted] […].” Therefore, they requested that the State submits “recordings which prove that said broadcasts were made and which indicate the date of such broadcasts.” Finally, they requested that the State be reminded that the Judgment must be promptly broadcast in Rama. 11. That in its observations the Commission stated (supra Having Seen clause 5) that from the “information submitted by the State it cannot be concluded that the obligations ordered by the Court have been fully complied with.” 12. That, though the State has submitted accurate information regarding the name of the radio stations and the languages in which the Judgment was broadcast, it has not as yet given the dates on which the above broadcasts were made. This information is necessary so that the Court may deem this obligation to have been complied with. 13. That in accordance with the reports submitted by the State (supra Considering clause 9), the obligation to publicize the Judgment in Rama is still pending compliance. 14. That it is necessary that the State submit further information to the Court with regard to the broadcast of the Judgment in Rama, as well as to the dates of all broadcasts of the Judgment, as ordered in the eighth operative paragraph thereof. * * * 15. That in Order of November 29, 2006 (supra Having Seen 2), the Court requested the State to submit up-to-date information on its compliance with the obligations ordered in the following operative paragraphs of the Judgment, namely: a) The adoption, within a reasonable time, of such legislative measures as may be necessary to provide for a simple, prompt, and effective judicial remedy to review the decisions adopted by the Supreme Electoral Council that may affect human rights, such as the right to participate in government, in compliance with the relevant legal and treaty guarantees, and to repeal any provisions that prevent said remedy from being sought (ninth operative paragraph of Judgment of June 23, 2005);