this case are subsumed within this measure of reparation and will be monitored within the framework of the monitoring of this judgment. The State must continue to report to the Court every two months, counting from the submission of its last report, on compliance with this measure. C. Measures of satisfaction c.1 Publication of judgment and summary 175. The Court decides, as it has in other cases, 345 that the State must publish, within six months of notification of this judgment: a) the official summary of this judgment prepared by the Court, once, in the Official Gazette, in an appropriate and legible font; b) the official summary of this judgment prepared by the Court, once, in a newspaper with widespread national circulation, in an appropriate and legible font, and c) this judgment in its entirety, available for one year, on an official website of the State. The State must advise this Court immediately when it has issued each of the publications ordered, regardless of the one-year time frame for presentation of its first report, as established in the 20th operative paragraph of this judgment. c.2 Annual scholarship and production and dissemination of the program "No es hora de callar" 176. The representatives asked the Court to order the Colombian State: (i) to grant an annual fellowship for a postgraduate researcher to contribute to developing the work of the Media and Gender Observatory of the Universidad Central and the campaign "No Es Hora de Callar” for the next 5 years and that (ii) the State ensure the production and dissemination of the cross-media program “No es hora de callar,” to be broadcast by the public media system with at least 60 minutes of content per month for 5 years in order to raise awareness on the rights of women to exercise of journalism in Colombia. 177. The State indicated that the domestic legal system provides for different routes through which victims can obtain reparation and indicated that it had implemented measures of satisfaction for Jineth Bedoya. It noted that Ms. Bedoya was recognized and included in the Unified Victims Registry on May 9, 2013 for the victimizing acts of (i) threats, (ii) kidnapping, (iii) torture, and (iv) crimes against freedom and sexual integrity during the armed conflict. Based on this, Ms. Bedoya received (i) financial compensation, (ii) a dignification letter, (iii) the National Day for the Dignity of Women Victims of Sexual Violence in the framework of the Internal Armed Conflict was declared, and (iv) received psychosocial support. 178. Regarding the fellowship requested, the State indicated that it has the Observatory for Memory and Conflict of the National Center for Historical Memory and that, therefore, the measure was not necessary. It added that Colombia "supports research and promotes higher education by granting scholarships and educational loans prioritizing students with fewer economic opportunities and good academic performance" and that all students and journalists who require some kind of support "can go to the Colombian Institute of Educational Lending and Technical Studies Abroad.” Lastly, with regard to the dissemination of the program "No es hora de callar," the State indicated that every day the documentary "Fragmentos" is screened at the “anti-monument" that was built in compliance with the terms of the Peace Agreement, which should be assessed positively by the Court. 179. In view of the violations declared in this case, the Court establishes that the State must Cf. Case of Montesinos Mejía v. Ecuador. Preliminary Objections, Merits, Reparations, and Costs. Judgment of January 27, 2020. Series C No. 398, para 226, and Case of Grijalva Bueno v. Ecuador, supra, para. 177. 345 61