11 release document. It is worth noting that according to the information provided by the representatives, described in Considering Paragraph 35 of the Order from August 5, 2008 (supra Having Seen 3), Ms. Salome Ic Rojas was part of the list of 20 individuals with similar names that appear in the Judgment on Reparations that had not received any payment. 37. That neither the representatives nor the Commission have referred to what was expressed by the State in relation to the payment in favor of Ms. Salome Ic Rojas. 38. That considering the information provided by the State, the Court observes that the payment in favor of Ms. Salome Ic Rojas has been fulfilled. 39. That following, this Court will refer to the cases of Lucia Raxcacó Sesám and Natividad Morales, described in Considering Paragraphs 25 and 33 of the Order of August 5, 2008, respectively (supra Having Seen 3), in view of the fact that the State provided specific information on their situation. 40. That regarding the compensation in favor of Lucia Raxcacó Sesam, deceased, the State reported on November 25, 2008, that the second and third payments are still pending to be made to her sons Hugo Leonel and Irma Johann, last names Galeano Raxcacó, since the children’s legal representative has not presented the “full documentation” for this purpose. Regarding Ms. Natividad Morales, in the report of August 28, 2008, the State expressed that she died after receiving the first two payments. Upon becoming aware of this situation, her relatives were informed that they had to carry out a probate proceeding to be able to make the pending compensation to the heirs (supra Having Seen 4). 41. That the representatives have not provided any information on what was expressed by the State in relation to Ms. Lucia Raxcacó Sesám and the lack of a second and third payment in her favor, nor regarding the third payment in favor of Ms. Natividad Morales or her heirs. 42. That in its observations, the Commission expressed that it valued the State’s initiative to perform the corresponding payment, and it deemed it “useful and necessary to become aware of the enforcement relating to the payments pending to the children of Ms. Lucia Raxcacó and to the persons who have not come forward to make a claim.” 43. That of the information submitted by the State, this Court considers necessary for the representatives to report precisely on the current status of the probate proceeding of Lucia Raxcacó Sesám and Natividad Morales, and the corresponding payment to their heirs. 44. That notwithstanding the above, the Court has verified that the state reports (supra Having Seen 4) make no reference to any specific measure adopted to comply with what is indicated in Considering clauses 22, 37, 38, 39 and 42 of the Order of August 5, 2008 (supra Having Seen 3), in relation to the payments pending for compensation in favor of some of the victims. Therefore, this Court considers it necessary to require that both the State and the representatives report precisely on the situation of each of the individuals found in the following assumptions: a) those who have not received any of the payments (see table attached to Order from August 5, 2008); and b) those who have names that are identical or similar who have not received payment of the corresponding compensations (see table attached to Order from August 5, 2008). Likewise, the Court considers that it is essential for the Commission to provide its observations on this matter.