5 Comprehensive Health Insurance System, as victims of human rights violations benefiting by order of the Court. The State also affirmed that it had complied with the health care services and psychological support for the victims, and indicated that “it was continually supporting the measures taken to comply with these services through the Ministry of Health, as established in Ministerial Resolution No. 474-2006/MINSA of May 18, 2006, which resolved to provided medical and psychological care to the beneficiaries, Nolberto Durand Vargas and Virginia Bonifacia Ugarte Rivera; and (b) regarding the obligation to provide support for the construction of a residence, in official communication No. 7351-06-GG, the State indicated that the work had been carried out in 2002 and that it had therefore complied with the obligation. 10. That, on September 11, 2003, prior to the above-mentioned State reports, the representatives had indicated that the State had not provided the health care services. They mentioned that, in relation to the psychological support, a visit to the Lima zoological gardens had been scheduled in 2002 and that the State had not taken any other relevant measure. Regarding the support for the construction of a residence, they indicated that the State, through the Materials Bank, had begun to comply with this obligation. Nevertheless, the representatives made no subsequent mention of the actions taken by the State in this regard. 11. That the Commission indicated in its observations of September 8, 2003, and April 6, 2005, that, regarding the health care and interpersonal development services, psychological support and support for the construction of a residence, the State had not provided any elements that would allow it to ascertain the measures adopted to offer the victims the said support. Subsequently, in its observations of September 14 and November 14, 2007, and March 27, 2008, the Commission stated that, according to the Court’s Order of November 27, 2002, several measures were pending compliance (supra third having seen paragraph); nevertheless, it indicated that subsequent to the said Order, the State had complied with some measures, without making any specific reference to the obligations established in the third operative paragraph of the judgment. 12. That, based on the information forwarded by the State and the corresponding evidence that has been provided, the Court finds that the State has made significant progress in providing the health care services and psychological support and interpersonal development to Nolberto Durand Vargas and Virginia Bonifacia Ugarte Rivera, and also to support the construction of their residence. However, in the observations they submitted following the State’s reports of June 14, August 18 and September 4, 2006, and July 9 and December 18, 2007 (supra fourth having seen paragraph), the representatives and the Commission have not made a specific reference to the status of compliance with these measures. Consequently, the Court considers it essential that both the representatives and the Commission forward their specific and precise observations on the status of compliance with the said obligations ordered in the third operative paragraph of the judgment, so that the Court can duly assess the status of compliance with them. * * * 13. That, regarding subparagraph (a) of the fourth operative paragraph (supra first having seen paragraph), the State reported that it had published the judgment on merits in the Official Gazette El Peruano on November 14, 2002. It also reported that, on the same day, it had published the judgment on reparations and costs. Regarding