situation. 73 As a result of the complaints, the Prosecutor was penalized for serious misconduct. 74 57. On February 7, 2008, the Quiroga Santa Cruz family's lawyer reiterated the request for access to information and requested the "declassification of documents from the Second Department of the Joint Chiefs of Staff from June 1979 to December 1980." 75 On July 25, 2008, by official communication 496/2008, the President of the Third Criminal Chamber of the Superior Court of the Justice District of La Paz informed the Commander in Chief of the Armed Forces of the order to declassify the documents from June 1979 to December 1980, and to send legalized copies of the entries and exits to the Joint Chiefs of Staff of July 10-20, 1980. 76 58. Olga Flores also filed an appeal for annulment and cassation against Resolution 103/2008 of the Third Criminal Chamber of the Superior Court of La Paz, considering "with regard to the appeal for annulment in that procedural forms have not been observed within the [...] proceedings [,...], there has been no correct assessment of the evidence [...], there has not been a correct classification of the crimes, and the corresponding penalty has not been fixed [and neither] have overlapping offenses been applied against the convicts." The appeal in cassation was based on "an erroneous interpretation of the law [and] a violation of substantive law, in that it confirmed the ruling of the first instance regarding the crime of false testimony." 77 In addition, it argued that the crimes that gave rise to the proceedings of the "Public Prosecutor v. Franz Pizarro Solano et al." are crimes against humanity, and alleged disproportionality of the imposed penalties on the accused parties. In addition, some of the accused parties filed incidental appeals against the aforementioned resolution, in which they requested the dismissal or extinction of the criminal action, among other remedies or means of appeal. 59. On February 15, 2010, at the appeal stage, Olga Flores Bedregal reiterated her request for the declassification of the Armed Forces archives. 78 In addition, on March 12, 2010, the Appeals Prosecutor of the State Prosecutor General's Office requested that the Supreme Court of Justice grant the request for declassification of the files filed by Olga Flores. 79 This request was granted in Supreme Order No. 125 of the First Criminal Chamber of the Supreme Court of Justice (hereinafter also "Supreme Order No. 125") of April 1, 2010, in which it ordered the Joint Chiefs of Staff "to declassify the files existing in the Second Department of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, from June 1979 to December 1980, and the report of entries and exits to the Joint Chiefs of Staff from July 10 to 20, 1980," and send legalized copies to the same court. 80 On April 16, 2010, by Supreme Order No. 167 the same First Criminal Chamber of the Supreme Court of Justice (hereinafter also "Supreme Order No. 167") a declassification order was added at the request of Olga Flores to also include the documents related to the Armed 73 Cf. Brief to summon the District Attorney before the Human Rights Commission of the Chamber of Deputies, submitted by Olga Flores Bedregal, dated April 14, 2008 (case file of evidence, p. 372-374). 74 Cf. T.N.D. Resolution No. 006/2010, issued by the National Disciplinary Tribunal on February 19, 2010 (case file of evidence, p. 396-399). 75 Cf. Brief of presentation and request for new evidence, by attorney Ximena A. Prudencio Bilbao, representative of Marcelo Quiroga Santa Cruz's family, February 7, 2008 (case file of evidence, p. 8503-8508). 76 Cf. Record 496/2008, signed by the President of the Third Criminal Chamber of the Superior Court of Justice of La Paz, of July 25, 2008 (case file of evidence, p. 488-498). 77 Cf. Appeal for annulment and cassation pursued by Olga Beatriz Flores Bedregal, of January 24, 2009 (case file of evidence, p. 434-455). 78 Cf. Brief of request for a reasoned order, presented by Olga Flores Bedregal, of February 15, 2010 (case file of evidence, p. 8524-8527), and Supreme Order No. 125 issued by the First Criminal Chamber of the Supreme Court of Justice of April 1, 2010 (case file of evidence, p. 524-527). 79 Cf. Brief of the Appeals Prosecutor of the Office of the Prosecutor General of the Republic, of March 12, 2010 (case file of evidence, p. 561-564). 80 Cf. Supreme Order No. 125 issued by the First Criminal Chamber of the Supreme Court of Justice, supra. 19